1

I often see old Nikkor lenses for sale that have one deformation on the lens barrel, at the level of the filter. The focusing barrel is intact, the rest of the lens is in good condition, the glass is fine.

enter image description here

I can't not believe that a dent of this magnitude comes from simply dropping the lens, because I would expect some other damage, like an associated scratch on the focusing ring and the glass to have some damage!

Is there some rig people used to put their lenses on, or attach some device to the filter thread in the old film days that would cause this characteristic damage?

I'm also impressed by how much these lenses can go for - I would have thought not being able to use filters would affect the price, and the knowledge that the lens has been subject to such a large shock would cast suspicion on the lens calibration at least.

  • 2
    They get dented by dropping the lens, usually while attached to the camera body. Usually because of how the kit is weighted as well as how it is held, the lens drops at an angle that causes this type of damage. – dpollitt Oct 26 '13 at 3:35
  • @dpollitt - However, then the dent should be symmetrically opposite to the red dot that marks the aperture and focus points. The dents are usually off to a side. Also, such a fall should damage the glass and uncalibrate the lens, no? – Kaushik Ghose Oct 26 '13 at 3:38
  • It's arguably the thinnest point on the lens and the most likely place to get a dent. As to why? That can only be pure speculation. I don't really think this question can be reasonably answered. – John Cavan Oct 26 '13 at 5:43
  • 2
    @KaushikGhose - keep in mind that the dot is normally aligned to the top when inserting the lens, but it is then rotated, also, on some lenses the front element itself rotates when zooming or focusing. – AJ Henderson Oct 26 '13 at 14:42
  • 1
    Alternative explanation is that any other damage will cause the lens to be thrown away. – Rene Aug 20 '14 at 6:11
2

It's a bad combination of materials and positioning.

Damage of this sort usually is located on the 3 o'clock, 6 o'clock, and 9 o'clock positions on the lens filter thread due to knocks when suspended by the camera neck strap and by setting the camera down a bit too hard on a flat hard surface.

The reason that the damage is so severe from such light knocks is due to the material used for the lens barrel which is usually brass with surface treatment to reduce the reflecting surface. Brass is extremely soft. As an experiment, take a piece of tin foil and see how much effort is necessary to dent it. Brass isn't much stronger than tin. The threads inside the flange further weaken the thin metal there.

Add a heavy lens and camera and the filter threaded flange will dent easily with almost no inertia.

  • 3
    "Tin foil" is made of aluminium these days. Both aluminium and tin are quite a bit softer than brass. The reason it's easy to bend tin foil is mainly how thin it is. Brass is harder than most metals, including copper and gold, and only a little softer than platinum and iron. As far as materials for camera construction go, any metal will be soft enough to dent easily, especially at its thinnest point. Steel or cast iron are the only metals that are somewhat hard, and that's only because they are an alloy of iron and carbon, carbon being a non-metal and the hardest material there is. – thomasrutter Oct 28 '13 at 0:43
  • Brass (and copper) also work/strain harden considerably... – rackandboneman Sep 15 at 23:26
1

Ok, I think I figured it out: It's a tripod accident. I just did it to one of my lenses. What happens is that the camera is set with the pitch screw not completely tightened, and the camera pitches nose down due to the weight of the lens and the lens hits the tripod stem in just one place, very sharply.

1

I have two old lenses that I knocked down causing dented filter ring. Both were attached to camera body. One was a 2ft drop onto a soft flooring, one was a 1/2 ft knock to a basin, when I was hanging the camera on my shoulder. Both lenses are still functionally intact.

0

I agree that the damage was probably caused by being dropped, but I think it is just as likely that the lens was dropped while not attached to the camera, such as while cleaning, storing or changing lenses. I also agree that the value of a lens that has obvious damage is greatly reduced. However, if you can test the lens before you buy it and it works well in all other respects, it may be a worthwhile compromise in order to get a better lens than you could otherwise afford. Many vendors allow generous return policies if you are not satisfied.

0

A lot of it has to do with being careless in the first place or inexperienced people or kids getting ahold of a camera and banging it against something or dropping it.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.