If I take a photo in raw, edit it a little in Lightroom, then upload it to flickr, when I click on the photo in flickr to open it then click on it again to enlarge it, there seems to be quite a lot of detail. When I take the same file to a high street photo printers I am always disappointed. Can I get a print that has the same amount of detail, and if so where?

  • \$\begingroup\$ I've spent the past 3 months researching a printer for my work - to cut a very long story short - & not really surprisingly; the more you pay, the better the result. [Not necessarily because of processing differences, but attention to detail.] \$\endgroup\$
    – Tetsujin
    Commented Jul 28, 2017 at 19:52
  • \$\begingroup\$ What size are the prints you have had printed? \$\endgroup\$
    – osullic
    Commented Jul 28, 2017 at 22:10

2 Answers 2


Viewing size determines visible detail. The visible detail will depend on the viewing size. If you print an image 6x4 inches size, it is always 4 inches tall. Substitute 10x8 inches if you wish, but a print cannot show more detail than its size.

If you view it enlarged to full screen size on your monitor, depending on the monitor, it might be 10 or 11 inches tall. That can show much more detail. And if you zoom in on it larger, to show only half of previous content, the overall total (unseen) size might be 20 or 22 inches then. Much more fine detail becomes visible at that size. Enlargement certainly does help viewing.

We think of digital resolution as pixels per inch. However, there is definitely a limit, and in common viewing situations/distances, our eye cannot resolve more than maybe 300 pixels per inch. If we condense 1000 pixels into an inch (in a small print), our eye cannot benefit from it, we cannot see that detail then.

  • \$\begingroup\$ thank you for your reply ,but does this mean I can only ever look at one of photos in such detail on a computer monitor and not have a physical copy \$\endgroup\$
    – user67070
    Commented Jul 28, 2017 at 19:56
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Well, you could print a larger print, or enlarge a smaller portion of it, etc. But yes, to see all of your pixels, you do have to spread them out enough to where the eye can see their detail. Just saying, viewing a small size image cannot show all that viewing a large size image could show. \$\endgroup\$
    – WayneF
    Commented Jul 28, 2017 at 19:56
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Looking at an ≈22MP image at 100% magnification (zoomed all the way in) on a 23" HD (1920x1080) monitor is like looking at a small piece of a 60x40" print! \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Commented Jul 28, 2017 at 22:08

If you print a photo at "passport photo" size, of course you won't see all the detail that the image holds; it's too small. Solution... print larger. Now, of course I don't presume you are printing at passport photo size, but the logic is the same.

(Of course there are limits - you can't just choose any arbitrary print size, because your image is composed of only so many pixels to begin with.)


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.