I have seen some photos where a far-away object looks much bigger compared to nearby objects. Apparently this is called lens compression and it has to do with the focal length of a lens. How can I achieve this effect? How does it work?
Related: photo.stackexchange.com/questions/50468/… and photo.stackexchange.com/questions/19970/…– BelleMar 21, 2018 at 9:59
This has all been well covered here before. Why is the background bigger and blurrier in one of these images? and Does wide angle equivalent in crop sensor skew image? and What does it really mean that telephoto lenses “flatten” scenes? and Is there a difference between taking a far shot on a 50mm lens and a close shot on a 35mm lens? and many others.– Michael CMar 21, 2018 at 12:28
@MichaelClark I did notice that, but I felt like the information is spread over so many different questions and all of them seem to only reference (a different aspect of) it. I wanted to understand why it works that way.– BelleMar 21, 2018 at 12:33
It's pretty much all covered in one place by at least at least two different answers to What is the difference between perspective distortion and barrel or pincushion distortion?. It's more succinctly covered at What is background compression?.– Michael CMar 21, 2018 at 12:52
How can I achieve this effect?
Lens compression does not directly have anything to do with the focal length of a lens, though it may seem that way. In fact, it has everything to do with the distance between the camera, the subject and the background. You can achieve the effect by taking your distance from the nearby objects. Technically, cropping a photo taken with a 'normal' lens would have the same effect on the compression as using a telephoto lens.
How does it work?
First, about focal length. Focal length does not directly influence lens compression. It does have an effect on depth of field (bokeh) and the field of view. In fact, two photos taken from the same spot, one with a 35mm lens that was cropped and one with a 100mm lens, would show exactly the same size objects.
What does effect lens compression is the distance between the camera and the subject(s). In fact, it is the ratio of the distance between the camera and the subject(s) compared to the distance between individual parts of the subject(s) that decide how large these look relatively to one another. It is all about relativity!
Actually, taking your distance will make nearby objects smaller to a greater extend than far-away objects. To the human eye, it will seem that the nearby object grew smaller relatively to the far-away object. If you would think of relative sizes, you can say that the far-away object grew larger relatively to the nearby object. All you now need is a way to reduce the field of view, which can be using a lens with a longer focal length.
I suggest Elizabeth Gray's article about lens compression on Photographylife.com. She has taken some example photographs that make the effect of focal length quite clear.
How the size of different objects in a photo appear in relation to one another is what we refer to as Perspective.
Perspective is determined by the position of the camera relative to the scene as well as the position of each element in the scene relative to the other elements in the scene. When a camera position produces a perspective that makes an object or scene look different than we might expect it to look we call that perspective distortion. The camera position gives us a view of a scene or object within that scene that is different from what we would normally expect the scene or object to look like as interpreted by our brains when looking at it with our own eyes.
Perspective distortion is kind of a misnomer. There is really only perspective. It is determined by a viewing position of a scene.
In the context of photography perspective is a result of the position of the camera in relation to the scene as well as the positions of the various elements in the scene with respect to one another.
If one takes a photo of a three dimensional cube from a position very close to one corner the nearest corner of the cube appears to be stretched towards the camera. If one takes a photo of the same cube from a much greater distance and a much longer focal length so that the cube is the same size in the frame, the same corner of the cube appears to be flattened.
Image copyright 2007 SharkD, licensed CC-BY-SA 3.0
Many people misunderstand that it is the focal length of the lenses that cause the difference. It is not. It is the shooting position used to frame the cube with the two different lenses. If we had a camera and wide angle lens, both with sufficient resolution, and shot the cube with the wide angle lens from the same position as we had filled the frame with the cube using the longer focal length lens and then cropped the resulting photo so the cube is the same size the perspective would also be the same - the cube would appear just as flattened as when we shot it using the longer lens.
If one takes a photo of a rectangular skyscraper from the sidewalk across a narrow street the top of the building will look much narrower than the bottom. (Unless we were to properly use a tilt/shift perspective control lens or a view camera capable of perspective control movements.) When we view the scene with our own eyes our brain compensates for this difference and we perceive that the top of the building is the same width as the bottom. But when we view the photo we took from the same spot we don't give our brain the same full battery of clues (mainly our stereo vision due to having two eyes) and our brain does not perceive the photo in the same way as it perceived the actual scene from the same position.
The same is true when we take a portrait of a face from such a close distance that the nose looks twice as large as the ears. The nose is so much closer to the camera than the ears are that they appear much larger in proportion to the ears than they really are. When we view another person's face from such a distance with our eyes our brain processes the scene and corrects for the differences in distance between the various parts of the face in front of us. But when we view a photo taken from the same distance our brain lacks all of the clues it needs and can't build the same corrected 3D model in our perception of the photo.
Here's an extreme example of the effect differences in shooting distance have when using different focal lengths to get the same framing from different distances. The change in perspective is due to the change in shooting distance and the different distance ratios between the various elements in the scene and the camera as the camera moves forward and back to preserve framing of the subject at various focal lengths.
Consider what we refer to as telephoto compression:
Let's assume you are 10 feet away from your friend Joe and take his picture in portrait orientation with a 50mm lens. Say there is a building 100 feet behind Joe. The building is 10X the distance from the camera as Joe is, so if Joe is 6 feet tall and the building is 60 feet tall they will appear to be the same height in your photo, because both would occupy about 33º of the 40º angle of view of a 50mm lens along the longer dimension.
Now back up 30 feet and use a 200mm lens. Your total distance from Joe is now 40 feet which is 4X further than the 10 feet you used with the 50mm lens. Since you are using a focal length that is 4X the original 50mm (50mm X 4 = 200mm), he will appear the same height in the second photo as he did in the first. The building, on the other hand, is now 130 feet from the camera. That is only 1.3X as far as it was in the first shot (100ft X 1.3 = 130ft), but you have increased the focal length by 4X. Now the 60 foot tall building will appear to be roughly 3X the height of Joe in the picture (100ft / 130ft = 0.77; 0.77 X 4 = 3.08). At least it would if all 60 feet of it could fit in the picture, but it can't fit at that distance with a 200mm lens.
Another way to look at it is that in the first photo with the 50mm lens, the building was 10X further away than Joe was (100ft / 10ft = 10). In the second photo with the 200mm lens, the building was only 3.25X further away than Joe was (130ft / 40ft = 3.25), even though the distance between Joe and the building was the same. What changed was the ratio of the distance from the camera to Joe and the distance of the camera to the building. That is what defines perspective: The ratio of the distances between the camera and various elements of a scene.
In the end, the only thing that determines perspective is camera position and the relative positions of the various elements of the scene.
For a look at how even a fairly slight difference in perspective affects an image, please see: Why is the background bigger and blurrier in one of these images?
This has all been well covered here before.
Why is the background bigger and blurrier in one of these images?
What does it really mean that telephoto lenses "flatten" scenes?
What is background compression?
Does wide angle equivalent in crop sensor skew image?
Is there a difference between taking a far shot on a 50mm lens and a close shot on a 35mm lens?
How does focal length change perspective?
What is the difference between perspective distortion and barrel or pincushion distortion?