1
\$\begingroup\$

The problem mentioned in the title, i.e. 'left part of image is much softer than the right part', is clearly demonstrated in the image below.

enter image description here

It is less obvious when it 'focuses' at the centre of the image:

enter image description here

The images came from Canon 550D with a Helios 44-2 lens @F2.0.

I read the uneven sharpness across the imaging could be caused by lens decentering, but I'm also wondering if it could be caused by the adaptor.

This Helios 44-2 is the newest version of its kind. The problem with this version of the lens is that the surface of the M42 thread flange is flush with the back end of the focus ring, as can be seen from the image below:

enter image description here

My worry is if the surface of the flange is slightly lower than the back end of the focus ring, the M42-EOS adaptor may come into contact with the focus ring, which effectively increases the distance between the sensor and the lens, and I do feel a little bit harder to turn the focus ring with the adaptor attached.

So, what do you think? Is this lens decentred or it could be the adaptation?


Update

Here's some 100% crops of two other images I took this morning against the test chart.

Focused

enter image description here

Defocused

enter image description here

These images show the four large black & white tiles arranged around the star pattern in the test chart. The purpose of this is to do a 'flare' test similar to what Roger Cicala suggested in his blog post (Thanks @MichaelClark for this link).

According to Roger:

if the lens is decentered or significantly tilted the center blur will ‘flare’ out in one direction or another as you defocus.

In the defocused image, a substantial amount of flare can be seen in the tile blocks in the top left and nearly invisible in those in the bottom right. This might suggest the lens is probably indeed decentred or tilted.

Is this still possible the adaptor plate to blame?

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ It could also be as simple as the optical axis of the lens not being perpendicular to the test chart. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Commented Jun 10, 2017 at 1:32
  • \$\begingroup\$ @MichaelClark, I was aware of this. I have actually tried shooting at the chart with another Heliso 44-2 at the same spot and posture, and the result was a fine image. \$\endgroup\$
    – Anthony
    Commented Jun 10, 2017 at 1:38
  • \$\begingroup\$ "same spot and posture" Posture ? That suggests you're testing hand-held, which is just asking for problems like this. Are you testing hand-held ? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 10, 2017 at 5:57
  • \$\begingroup\$ @StephenG, I meant the 'posture' of the camera on a tripod. I couldn't come up with a better word for this. sorry about the confusion :) \$\endgroup\$
    – Anthony
    Commented Jun 10, 2017 at 8:46

1 Answer 1

3
\$\begingroup\$

What you are describing is properly known as tilt. What it means is that the optical axis of the lens is not perpendicular to the plane occupied by the camera's sensor. In your case the entire lens appears to be tilted relative to the camera's lens mounting flange.

Just look at the adapter plate. The right side in the photo is significantly closer to the focus ring than the other. With wide aperture wide angle lenses misalignment of as little as 20 microns can be seen when used with high resolution sensors. In this case we can eyeball the difference from several inches or even feet away! As it sits the lens is flat on the table and the adapter plate is crooked. But once the lens is attached to the camera, the adapter plate will be square with the camera and the lens will be pointing at a slight angle.

enter image description here

There are specialized lenses that intentionally introduce such angles between the image plane in the camera and the optical axis of the lens. They usually include tilt movements as well as shift movements. Thus they are called Tilt/Shift or Perspective Control lenses.

Just as an aside, a decentered lens element is, in some ways, similar to a shift movement using a T/S lens. The biggest difference is that all of the elements in a T/S lens are moved together and the various pieces of glass stay in the same alignment with respect to the others. When only one lens element moves in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis of the lens it results in degraded image quality because it is no longer aligned with the other elements in the lens.

You could also get the same result if the camera/lens system is perfectly self aligned but the entire system is improperly aligned with the test chart. The sensor and test chart must be parallel to one another or one side of the chart (or the top, or the bottom, or one of the corners) will be closer to the camera than the other. This will result in only one part of the chart being in focus at any particular focus distance.

For a good explanation of the difference between decentered, tilted, and mis-spaced lens elements (with illustrations) and how to test for each, please see Roger Cicala's excellent blog entry titled: Testing for a Decentered Lens: an Old Technique Gets a Makeover

\$\endgroup\$
13
  • \$\begingroup\$ "If the tilt is side-to-side, the top and bottom of the image might be fine, but both sides soft. If it is corner-to-corner the top right and lower left corners might be fine, while the top left and lower right are soft." Quoted from Roger Cicala. If you examine the first image closely, you will find the sharpness variation across the image is wired. From the bottom right corner towards the centre is the sharpest area, then comes the top right corner which is a bit softer, bottom left corner considerably softer and the top left corner the softest. Do you think this is still lens tilting? \$\endgroup\$
    – Anthony
    Commented Jun 10, 2017 at 8:58
  • \$\begingroup\$ Sorry about the accept-undo-accept-accept-undo-accept thing... I accidentally tapped the accept button when scrolling down the page on android app. \$\endgroup\$
    – Anthony
    Commented Jun 10, 2017 at 9:55
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ "If the tilt is side-to-side, the top and bottom of the image might be fine, but both sides soft." That depends on where the focus is centered. Roger's statement assumes the center is the most in-focus part of the chart. If the focus is centered to the right of center then the right side would appear to be more in focus than the left. The middle might still be within the acceptable depth of field and appear in focus as well. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Commented Jun 10, 2017 at 10:43
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ "From the bottom right corner towards the centre is the sharpest area, then comes the top right corner which is a bit softer, bottom left corner considerably softer and the top left corner the softest. Do you think this is still lens tilting?" Yes, it is fairly obviously lens tilting, perhaps also combined with a focusing error. If the area between the lower right corner and the center are the most in focus areas, then the focus was likely correct for the point halfway between the lower right corner and the center. The further one moves from that point, the softer the image gets. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Commented Jun 10, 2017 at 10:47
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ The other thing one must also consider is that most lenses vary a bit from one side to the other anyway, before tilt is introduced. Any misalignment will be more noticeable on the side that started out softer to begin with. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Commented Jun 10, 2017 at 10:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.