11
\$\begingroup\$

I just purchased a Sigma 10-20mm lens (Canon mount) and based on the reviews I was aware that many people receive copies of the lens that are soft or don't focus properly. I purchased from B&H, so I'm not worried about returning it other than the hassle. What are some tests that I can do to determine if my copy of the lens should be returned?

So far I've locked the camera on the tripod and taken comparison shots of a bar-code with both the Sigma lens and my 18-55mm kit lens. Below are crops (zoomed into 100% and cropped, only showing the center part of the image):

alt text

alt text

The kit lens seems sharper and the depth-of-field seems to be more centered around the focal point whereas the Sigma lens seems to have the focus point placed toward the very back of the DOF area.

Is it possible to tell if the copy of the lens is bad from these shots or are there other tests I should do?

Update:

Here are links to two (full-size) focus-chart images I took based on one of the resources in Eruditass' answer:

From these it seems that at 20mm, the focus is pretty spot-on, while at 10mm it might be shifted to the front by 5-10mm or so but with the target still in the acceptable DOF. Since most of my usage at 10mm will be landscapes stopped down for max DOF and the affect isn't at all focal lengths, I'm considering that the autofocus calibration of this lens is fine for my purposes.

\$\endgroup\$

2 Answers 2

8
\$\begingroup\$

Some key points:

Focus points are larger than the LED that lights up. As a result, the camera will pick anything within the area, usually the with the most contrast (often what is closest yet not too far on the edge of the AF sensor).

Depth of field is larger with a shorter focal length, and of course with a smaller aperture. What this means is that the AF sensor will say that the area is in focus even though it is on the edge of the field in focus and not centered.

Some other interesting facts about focusing:

Some lenses, due to spherical aberration, change their plane focus when stopped down from wide open. This mostly affects fast lenses.

Many AF sensors are only accurate to around f4 or f5.6. This means it will stop when an object is within the acceptable focus for a depth of field as if the lens was at f4 or f5.6.

To really check for accurate focus, you should use a focus chart with only one spot of contrast, so you can be sure of where you are focusing. I like to use this, page 18.

An even better test is the moire interference test.

Lastly, many lenses perform quite different at close focus distances (usually much worse, with softness, haloing, and other aberrations that may not be present at all otherwise). Try to take some pictures of objects further away and compare it to full-sized samples from the same model.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks for these great resources. I've learned a huge amount about auto-focus systems from these, especially the focus-chart PDF. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 16, 2010 at 14:10
2
\$\begingroup\$

I assume when you say "100% crops" you mean you have posted the whole image (normally people mean the image has been cropped so the view is 100% zoomed in and we're seeing 1:1 pixels). As a result it's difficult to tell sharpness from those images. Also, as stated the angled sheet focus test is not accurate as you don't know exactly where the AF point in the camera is.

It's not true that "many people receive copies of the lens that are soft or don't focus properly", rather a lot of the people that have had problems have gone on the internet to complain about them.

At the end of the day it depends on what sort of photography you do - ultra wide-angles give such a large depth of field when not used as macro lenses, so if you shoot landscapes rather than barcodes it will probably be fine!

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ I've clarified the question: zoomed into 100% and cropped, only showing the center part of the image. Thanks! \$\endgroup\$ Commented Oct 16, 2010 at 12:58
  • \$\begingroup\$ Ah, the images are actually much bigger (1307px wide) than they appear on the site (640px), so they're not quite full images or 100% crops! \$\endgroup\$
    – Matt Grum
    Commented Oct 16, 2010 at 13:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.