0
\$\begingroup\$

I have a photo of some text that is blurry and so I can't really read it (I have glasses and it hurts my eyes when I try). I Googled for a tool to reduce blur, but without much luck.

this picture hurts too much my eyes and i can't read it :'(

Is there a way to remove or reduce the blur of an image like this?

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ The result of deblurring will be twice as bad as the initial image is. And the example which you provided is terrible. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 25, 2016 at 19:37

3 Answers 3

1
\$\begingroup\$

In general, blurring destroys information. The information is lost, no algorithm can recreate the original picture out of a blurred one unless it can somehow "guess" the information needed to do this.

A "sharpening" algorithm (as available in most graphic manipulation programs like GIMP or Photoshop) does not really create an unblurred version of the picture but instead only changes the existing blur in a way so that our eyes have the feeling that the picture is sharp (mainly by increasing local contrasts). If you look closely you will see a lot of artifacts which would still not be very readable.

You have a picture of text only; in this case it might be possible for an algorithm to figure out which character is meant (using OCR) and then make a new picture out of all recognized characters. For this it could use any font you like of course. This would still lose all details the algorithm did not recognize (e. g. accents, commas, dashes, etc.).

But in your case the quality of the picture is so bad that I don't think any algorithm would be able to help you. The (quite dark) lines which were already on the paper before it was written to also pose a problem for this approach. OCR algorithms don't handle such things very gracefully.

I fear in your case you are stuck with what you have. Maybe you can work with it if you only look at a zoomed part of your picture to avoid overstraining your eyes.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ There are software tools for deblurring. Some of them, perhaps Topaz InFocus, could get him close enough for the brain to take care of the rest. I was able to read most of it, though my French is not good enough to translate. \$\endgroup\$
    – Joanne C
    Commented Jan 23, 2016 at 3:34
1
\$\begingroup\$

Deblurring is possible, but it's a rather specialized task involving studying the image to determine what methods to apply to it. Standard tools don't work very well, as pointed out also in Alfe's answer, they make make the image look a bit sharper, but they won't be good at recovering lost details. In general, you'll always have irreversible loss of details, how much can actually be recovered depends on the noise. In the complete absence of noise it is in principle possible to recover the lost information due to blurring by inverting the mathematical operation that describes the blurring, which is called "deconvolution".

I have explained the details (for the simple rotationally symmetric blurring case, your picture seems to have a significant asymmetric blur) here, I've now written an ImageJ plugin that automatizes a lot of the tasks involved here, but the actual calculation of the point spread function is not yet implemented within ImageJ.

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

Shake reduction option in Photoshop may be useful for you. As part of shake reduction the image will become so noisy and crispy

so noise reduction also to be applied to it (camera raw filter) Though I am not quite sure about the readability of the letters because the lines also become so prominent after sharpening.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.