3
\$\begingroup\$

I was at 911 memorial last week. My Fuji S-1 Pro camera was scanned with the battery installed. Security personnel would not let me remove battery. Since then, a dark spot shows up on photos. This has happened before and the CCD assembly had to be replaced at a cost of $400. Is scanning to really blame for this?

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Is this dark spot appears on just the same location everytime? Please elaborate your question of what exactly your concern is. \$\endgroup\$
    – Jez'r 570
    Commented May 31, 2013 at 2:17
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Also post some images if you can. \$\endgroup\$
    – Regmi
    Commented May 31, 2013 at 3:20
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ If you could post a link to a sample picture with the problem it would help. Once you get enough reputation you can post the image directly here. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Commented May 31, 2013 at 3:46
  • \$\begingroup\$ You could post a link to a photo or photos. Or email to me and I'll add it if you wish. See profile for email address. Sensor dirt a possibility. More information needed before best advice on possible effect of scan can be given, but it seems unlikely that the scan caused the problem. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 31, 2013 at 4:55

1 Answer 1

1
\$\begingroup\$

Having the battery in the camera shouldn't make a bit of difference if the camera was turned off. I'm also not aware of any particular reason that the scanning equipment should have caused a problem, but what you are describing sounds like a dead or hot pixel. This is just something that can happen on cameras unfortunately. It's also possibly some dust on the sensor or lens.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I don't know which scanners are there at 911 Memorial, but I can tell from my experience that usual airports scanners never damaged my cameras, even with batteries installed, even after several passes in a short time. Usually they were switched off in my bag, so I can't tell if they could be damaged if they were on, but I guess not. \$\endgroup\$
    – gerlos
    Commented Jun 2, 2013 at 15:17
  • \$\begingroup\$ Probably a lost cause, but whoever downvoted could you please comment as to why. \$\endgroup\$
    – AJ Henderson
    Commented Jun 4, 2013 at 16:51
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Gerlos - yes, even if it was turned on, it shouldn't make a difference either, but when the camera is off, there shouldn't be any power to the sensor, so it's the same state with or without battery when off. \$\endgroup\$
    – AJ Henderson
    Commented Jun 4, 2013 at 16:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.