4
\$\begingroup\$

I'm so disappointed in my new 70-300mm lens (AF-S Nikkor ED lens.) I use auto-focus because I'm such an amateur. Is it my camera, (D40x) or the lens? It's probably me, but is there a trick to getting a clear, crisp photo while zoomed all the way out? Thanks everyone.

\$\endgroup\$
6
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Possible duplicate of Why does the quality of my pictures lower the more I zoom in? \$\endgroup\$
    – null
    Commented May 28, 2016 at 14:27
  • 7
    \$\begingroup\$ An example image with the EXIF intact (or you can post the info for us) is quite necessary. We can't guess what you did to cause a fuzzy photo. Please post an example to a site like flickr. \$\endgroup\$
    – dpollitt
    Commented May 28, 2016 at 14:31
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ This answer is also related \$\endgroup\$
    – null
    Commented May 28, 2016 at 14:32
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ The most experienced photographers probably use autofocus more often than not. Autofocus is a good thing. \$\endgroup\$
    – osullic
    Commented May 29, 2016 at 17:41
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @CarlWitthoft We already have Q&A about that. \$\endgroup\$
    – mattdm
    Commented Jun 1, 2016 at 8:53

2 Answers 2

7
\$\begingroup\$

There are many contributing factors:

  • Longer focal-lengths require faster shutter-speeds to reproduce details sharply when hand-held. The general rule-of-thumb is 1 over the effective focal-length of the lens. So a 300mm on a DX camera has an angle of view equivalent to 450mm and so you should expect 1/500s at least to get sharp images. The solution against this problem is simple: Use a tripod or a faster shutter-speed, exposure permitting.
  • Should you have the Nikkor AF-S 70-300mm F/4.5-5.6D ED, the optics are really poor towards the long end. Lenses do not have exactly the same performance at all focal-length. In particular that lens is extremely soft at 300mm at F/5.6-8. Things get better at F/11 but never quite match the performance at 70mm F/8 where the lens performs optimally. Should you want to visualize what is happening, check this out.
  • This is a variable aperture zoom, so at 300mm you can only open the lens to F/5.6 which is not even desirable due to optical performance but already reduces the amount of light reaching the sensor which causes shutter-speed to lower. This can be partially compensated by increasing ISO but that introduces noise which destroys fine details after a point.
\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Don't forget distance and glass in between. Lots of folks use zoom lenses to shoot things that are far away. Air isn't clear, and can create all sorts of distortion that isn't obvious until you blow things up with a zoom lens (particularly when it isn't a clear day outside). This is doubly true if you're shooting through a window. And low-quality filters can have a big impact, too. \$\endgroup\$
    – dgatwood
    Commented Jun 4, 2016 at 6:31
-1
\$\begingroup\$

The DX 40 is a “compact digital”; the imaging chip measures 16mm height by 24mm length. We can calculate the diagonal measure of this rectangle and that works out to 30mm. This tells us that setting the zoom to 30mm delivers a “normal” angle of view. That would be an angle of 45⁰ with the camera held horizontal (landscape).

70% of normal or shorter is considered wide-angle and 200% of “normal” or longer is the realm of telephoto. That’s 20mm or shorter for wide-angle and 60mm or longer for telephoto.

The key value is the “normal” which is 30mm. If you zoom to 300mm, your camera delivers a highly magnified view. How much magnification is 300mm? We divide 300 by 30 = 10 (written as 10X). This tells us that if you zoom to 300mm the view will be about the same as delivered by 10 power binoculars.

Now 10X magnification is challenging for any optical system. However Nikon lenses are up to snuff in this regard. The likely culprit is too slow a shutter speed.

When we zoom out to extreme magnification we are confronted by the fact that camera motion is also magnified; thus it has great influence in the sharpness of the captured image. As a rule of thumb we should set the shutter to 1/zoom = 1/300 of a second or faster to negate camera movement. This rule of thumb is valid for a full frame camera, so I think it best if we multiply by the magnification factor of 1.5 = 1/450 of a second or better. This is true if you are hand-holding the camera. If you mount the camera on a tripod or brace it against a post etc. you can use a slower shutter. The object is super sharp images by avoiding camera movement during the exposure.

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • \$\begingroup\$ I don't know about the DX40, but the D40x (the OP's camera) isn't a compact camera. Also, the first three paragraphs seem irrelevant to the question. \$\endgroup\$
    – ths
    Commented May 29, 2016 at 15:54
  • \$\begingroup\$ @thsThe OP’s camera sports a crop sensor. This 1.5 is a crop (magnification) factor. Another way to express this size is 1/1.5 X 1000 = 66% meaning this format is 66% or the size of a full frame. The first three paragraphs set the stage for what is “normal” vs. what is telephoto. A “normal” can be hand-held at 1/30 of a second. A 10X telephoto requires a far faster shutter speed. Why cast aspersions on a learning opportunity? \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 30, 2016 at 19:06
  • \$\begingroup\$ This is too vague to be useful. The pixel density, lens MTF, camera anti-shake, and other properties strongly affect the ability to produce a sharp image. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 31, 2016 at 12:27
  • \$\begingroup\$ I appreciate you taking the time to answer, however, I am left a bit confused by your response. My camera is, in fact, a D40x, not the other that you mention. I did find the portion of your comment, (... likely to be too show a shutter speed,) to be the most helpful. \$\endgroup\$
    – Bobbie J
    Commented Jun 19, 2016 at 14:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.