What makes better sense for situations like: low light, sports/action, wild life?
- More cross-type sensor on AF (like Canon does)
- Or more sensitive cross-type sensors (like Nikon does)
What makes better sense for situations like: low light, sports/action, wild life?
While is doesn't test the premise you lay out, there are some interesting conclusions in this experiments:
Such as: Camera brand does not matter. Individual body does matter. Max Aperture matters; around F2.8 is best. both F1.x and slow lenses perform worse. Also brand of lens - the original brand lenses, plus Sigma and Zeiss perform best. 3rd party lenses like Tamron and Tokina does not perform as well.
Maybe if you compare the specs on the body models and max aperture results in this experiment you can derive your answer.
Limiting strictly at your question:
At the time of writing, Canon 6D has the most sensitive cross-type sensor in the middle rated at -3 EV. Nikon 4Ds is only -2EV.
Most cross-type AF sensors are in Canon 1D X / 5D Mk 3.
If these are the only factors for you to rate the AF performance (generally they are not - see the others' answers), then you have:
For sports/fast moving actions you need many AF points - Canon 1D X
For low light (and rather stationary subjects) you need Canon 6D
It depends entirely on context. If you need to track something around the scene, the more cross type AF points you have, the better as they will provide more reliable tracking, but that said, having the most sensitive points you can have is also desirable, particularly for low light.
Both give advantages in their own way and both are most useful in different situations. I guess I would say you want as many cross type AF points as you need at the highest sensitivity you can get. If your content is static, then one single high sensitivity AF point is ideal, if things will be moving rapidly, a large number of AF points are needed and so the quantity would then have preference unless it is such low light that the AF points don't function (in which case the preference would go back to sensitivity over quantity.)