Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 14, 2014 at 18:31 comment added Niranjan Michael, one question (pardon me if it sounds stupid), with a body supporting sensitivity up to f/8, if I use a f/2.8 lens, do you think the AF will be less accurate?
Apr 13, 2014 at 0:44 comment added Michael C Just remember that due to the physics involved more sensitive (in terms of what is the minimum size of a lens' maximum aperture with which the point will function) also means less accurate due to the narrower baseline between the light from one side of the lens to the other.
Apr 11, 2014 at 3:34 history reopened Joanne C
Apr 11, 2014 at 3:34 history closed Michael C
Paul Cezanne
MikeW
Itai
Joanne C
Duplicate of What is the effect of the number of cross-type focus points on sharp focus?
Apr 9, 2014 at 15:03 answer added AJ Henderson timeline score: 1
Apr 9, 2014 at 12:41 review Close votes
Apr 12, 2014 at 15:05
Apr 9, 2014 at 12:23 comment added Michael C See photo.stackexchange.com/a/37381/15871
Apr 9, 2014 at 8:36 comment added Philip Kendall What do you mean by "better"? More accurate? Quicker acquisition? Better at tracking? The answers to those three question may well be different, and (as already commented) may actually have not very much to do with the AF sensors themselves.
Apr 9, 2014 at 8:34 answer added John Thomas timeline score: 2
Apr 9, 2014 at 8:04 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhotos/status/453805547620696064
Apr 9, 2014 at 7:22 comment added Richard Smith My gut feel is that more points are better for tracking purposes and more sensitive points are better for (extreme) low light. I can't substantiate this so I won't add this as an answer.
Apr 9, 2014 at 6:55 answer added Michael Nielsen timeline score: 4
Apr 9, 2014 at 5:01 history asked Niranjan CC BY-SA 3.0