6
\$\begingroup\$

@fluf and I were chatting on the site chat room and were talking about shutter life.

After looking at this rather interesting but scary site http://www.olegkikin.com/shutterlife/, it seems shutter life varies massively from camera to camera.

Apart from treatment of the camera, what makes one camera have a better shutter life than another?

I really don't understand the inner workings well enough to know, but this topic frightens the life out of me — similar to the life of my LCD TV at home.

Improve this question
\$\endgroup\$
4
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Shutters can be replaced rob, so even if they go, it's not the end of the world. \$\endgroup\$
    – ElendilTheTall
    Commented Apr 20, 2012 at 12:17
  • \$\begingroup\$ I can't see why this is an issue, assuming you get the 100K that most low end DSLRs quote. Unless you are a pro, it will take many years to take that many shots; at that point, the camera is obsolete because of improvements in sensors, CPUs for processing, etc. If you are a pro, its just an expense. \$\endgroup\$
    – Pat Farrell
    Commented Apr 20, 2012 at 20:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ @PatFarrell its a fair point - a bit more background on the discussion we were chatting about a 10k image timelapse on a Nikon D60. With the avg. life of 30k or so, this is a fair chunk. \$\endgroup\$
    – Rob
    Commented Apr 20, 2012 at 21:12
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ They only quote 30K? or was that some sample? Seems really low. 100K is more typical. I don't think I'd want to shoot 10K time lapse on a DSLR anyway, its not like you will care about the IQ on that many images. \$\endgroup\$
    – Pat Farrell
    Commented Apr 21, 2012 at 4:00

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
5
\$\begingroup\$

Shutter life is a statistically distributed value with one model of camera giving widely varying results, as the graphs and tables on the site that you referred to show.

Here "shutter" is liable to include anything that moves mechanically when the shutter is operated that would fatally stop camera operation if it 'failed'. Failed could include dead or walking wounded but I'll avoid fine details.

More than anything else, shutter life is a design decision by the camera manufacturer.

Mechanical aspects which influence it may include mirror mass and speed, acceleration and deceleration and end stop impact forces, blind masses and speeds, accelerations, impacts, various torques applied to lever mechanisms, bearing types and sizes and quantities and loadings, and lubrication and bearing materials. And more.

Major camera manufacturers have been playing these games for many decades and are well aware of the tradeoffs of price and cost and noise and max speed and more. Ultimatly they are able to make marketing driven decisions to provide a given level of user experience.

The page you provided - Olekkin shutter life expectancy database suggests that the application is uneven. Some early Canon DSLRs (300, 350 ?) initially had shockingly low claimed shutter actuation lifetimes and these were substantially upgraded on subsequent models. A low end camera will usually have a claimed life of about 100,000 actuations and from memory a Nikon D3 claims 300,000 actuation lifetime.

However, the stats on the referenced website suggest some quite inconsistent results.
Lifetimes to about 30 failures based on tables at right for Nikons.
D5000 - 750,000+ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
D3 - 150,000 - 200,000
D300 - 150,000 - 350,000

NB Sony seem to be very variable - eg Sony A900 - all over the map - 100,000 - 3,000,000+

But, the answer to "Why do manufacturers allow lifetimes to vary so widely?"is "because they can".

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.