0
\$\begingroup\$

From what I've read thus far, electronic shutter is a type of device that controls whether the image sensor is turned off or on non-mechanically.

What exactly controls it and how does it turns the sensor off or on (if charge is accumulated when the sensor exposed to light by a CCD/CMOS)?

If it's relatively fast, how come its flash sync is slower than a mechanical shutter?

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Re, "...a type of device..." Well, yes, BUT, it's not really a distinct device: It's the combination of an image sensor that is designed to be controlled in a certain way, and firmware running on the camera's CPU that controls it in that way. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 5, 2020 at 20:00

3 Answers 3

0
\$\begingroup\$
From what I've read thus far, electronic shutter is a type of device that controls whether the image sensor is turned off or on non-mechanically.

True.

What exactly controls it and how does it turns the sensor off or on (if charge is accumulated when the sensor exposed to light by a CCD/CMOS)?

The reset line is asserted on all pixel rows in the beginning. Then the reset line starts to be slowly released to have the first curtain matching the second curtain. The first curtain could be very fast, except... it must match the slow second curtain!

The second curtain is implemented by simply reading the sensor; there is no way to turn off charge accumulation without destroying the existing charge apart from (a) reading the sensor or (b) covering the sensor mechanically. The second curtain is slow, and thus, the first curtain needs to be artificially slowed down too to have constant exposure across the frame.

If it's relatively fast, how come its flash sync is slower than a mechanical shutter?

That's a big "if". Typically, it is not fast; it is slow. Slowness is due to slow readout speed.

However, Canon with EOS R5 will apparently have "new approaches for sensor stabilization". I think the new approaches work not by mechanically moving the sensor but rather by taking electronically numerous pictures in a very short time interval. So, EOS R5 could have faster electronic shutter. Or, it could not. We do not know yet.

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

Electronic shutters are pretty well described here.

Note that there are global full-frame shutters where all the pixels are transferred together, and non-global ones that are really rolling shutters. The "global" type is instantaneous but the rolling-shutter types would take time to expose and read the whole image and have relatively slow flash sync speeds.

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

The sync of electronic shutter depends on the implementation and whether it has to match a hybrid mechanical shutter curtain.

The Sony DSC-R1 for example (an APS-C class sensor compact camera released in 2005) has an electronic shutter that can sync at 1/1000 s without problems and allows working with fill-flash in rather bright situations. Of course, to make full use of it, you need a flash that actually delivers the bulk of its energy in such a short time frame.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.