The Dawn space probe took a lot of photos of the dwarf planet Ceres in the asteroid belt, and discovered the strange looking faculae (white spots) in the Occator crater that seem to glow in the photos, se photo below. The scientists that analyzed the pictures determined that the pixels showing the faculae are not saturated. That is, the CCD chip has not taken in excessive light in those pixels that image the faculae. That may very well be true, but the problem is that near saturation the charge accumulation becomes non-linear. Photons come in but, the charge in the "wells" doesn't grow linearly.
I strongly suspect that the faculae actively emit light, like a hot, white glowing object just out of a furnace. From what I understand the following should occur if the "wells" that collect electric charge in proportion to incident light, have received lots of light, that is close to the maximum; the accumulation of charge becomes "non-linear". The curve is no longer linear, but concave down and lies under the straight line. Is there any way that scientists can actually determine where on the curve they are? If you are close to saturation?
The chip in the Dawn camera, was called TH788X. It was apparently used in astronomical cameras in the 80's and also security cameras. Can something be said about it's non-linear properties near saturation? If you want a camera with a similar chip, what camera should you choose?
Update: I wonder if anyone has information on if and how the non-linear characteristics mentioned above, change when temperatures are very low, such as in space? Perhaps this is an issue that no one is really interested in? I mean, let's say you take a picture and then look at it and discover some overexposed areas; the normal procedure then is just to reduce light intake and take another picture, until you get a reasonable greyscale or colour scale.
Generally, are CCD-sensors in space probes heated, or are they just a few degrees above absolute zero?