Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Thank you for complex answer. So, they are, better?! ...I'm processing raw photos from cameras for year's, but Canon/Panasonic raw photo's has been far easier to process than any android generated raw photo. Maybe because 8 vs 10bit difference, maybe because of low dynamic range of smartphone raw vs smartphone jpg hdr photos, don't know. Apple ProRaw seems to be different according their advertisements. That's why I come to ask here
exaclty, as you said, my presets overprocess the image. Sure, sensor size and different inner processing techniques matters as well as 12 vs 14 bit, but, still. Are you consider raw from smartphone usable for your results, or you do it only on emergency case, when no other photos are good ? Thank you!
I've also readed words like "the picture looks more 3D" with profesional lens. So in other words, can professional lens make the same scene more professional and eye catchy?