8

The vast majority of the kit lenses sold with entry-level (or even upper entry-level) interchangeable lens cameras, tend to have an aperture range of f/3.5-5.6. This seems to be independent of whether you look at SLR or mirrorless cameras, which manufacturer you look at (Canon, Fujifilm, Nikon, Olympus, Panasonic, Samsung and Sony all make a f/3.5-5.6 kit lens) and also of sensor size (you can find a f/3.5-5.6 kit lens for all of Nikon 1, micro 4/3s and APS-C). About the only counter-examples I can find are the Pentax Q7 and Fujifilm X-E1, both of which have an f/2.8-4.5 lens. However, the Q7 with its relatively tiny sensor isn't exactly typical, and the X-E1 is definitely aimed a bit higher in the market - the cheaper X-M1 ships with a f/3.5-5.6 kit lens.

Is there anything "special" about the f/3.5-5.6 range which means that de facto every kit lens has the same aperture, or is it just a combination of engineering realities and no manufacturer being prepared to take a chance on "something different"?

  • 1
    FYI. when it says f/3.5-5.6 it is not a reference to the full range of fstops available for the lens. It is a reference to the widest available aperture available at the shortest and longest focal lengths respectively. For example if the lens is a 50mm to 100mm f/3.5-5.6 zoom lens then the largest (widest) aperture available at 50mm is f/3.5 and the largest fstop at 100mm is f/5.6. It does not mean that the lens only goes to f/5.6. – Alaska Man Dec 29 '17 at 1:56
8

It is mainly about the cost/benefit ratio of making cheap lenses. It doesn't cost a lot more to make a lens f/3.5 than f/8 at an 18mm focal length since the entrance pupil (sometimes referred to as the effective or apparent aperture) is still well within the diameter of the mounting flange used by most interchangeable lens camera systems. As the lens is zoomed out to 55mm, the needed entrance pupil for f/5.6 is just under 10mm while the needed entrance pupil for f/2.8 would be 20mm which is approaching a significant percentage of the diameter of the mounting flange of ≈38mm for the micro 4/3 format or the 44mm of the Nikon F mount. Since most lenses will be made at least the same diameter as the mounting flange, the room for an aperture of the size needed for an f/3.5-5.6 lens in the typical kit lens focal lengths is already inside the lens tube, even with all of the other things that are wedged between the diaphragm and the lens barrel.

Just to check you're talking about the same thing I think you're talking about - according to Wikipedia, the flange for Nikon F is 46.5 mm (Canon EF/EF-S is 44mm). Just a typo?

You are referring to the flange to sensor/film distance, also sometimes referred to as the registration distance. I'm referring to the throat diameter of the flange: how wide the hole in the ring at the front of the light box is, not how far in front of the focal plane it is.

| improve this answer | |
  • Just to check you're talking about the same thing I think you're talking about - according to Wikipedia, the flange for Nikon F is 46.5 mm (Canon EF/EF-S is 44mm). Just a typo? – Philip Kendall Sep 27 '13 at 7:44
  • 3
    You are referring to the flange to sensor/film distance, also sometimes referred to as the registration distance. I'm referring to the diameter of the flange: how wide the hole in the front of the light box is, not how far in front of the focal plane it is. – Michael C Sep 27 '13 at 7:52
  • since the entrance pupil (sometimes referred to as the effective or apparent aperture) is still well within the diameter of the mounting flange used by most interchangeable lens camera systems. This is utter nonsense. – Brandon Dube Dec 29 '17 at 5:50
  • @BrandonDube Please explain why you feel it is utter nonsense. Lenses generally have a diameter at least slightly larger than the mounting flange. For the likes of Canon, Nikon, Pentax, Minolta/Sony, etc. the size of that mounting flange combined with the registration distance for those mounts and the more or less minimum diameter of a lens made to fit them is roughly what is needed to accomodate an e.p. size of f/3.5-5.6 (and everything else that needs to be squeezed inside the barrel) with an 18-55mm zoom made for an APS-C sensor. – Michael C Dec 29 '17 at 7:50
  • This does begin to break down with systems that use a much shorter registration distance, but for lenses made for the more traditional 42-46mm registration distances and throat diameters of 44-54mm it holds fairly true for 18-50/55mm retrofocus zooms as well as 50/55-200/250mm telephoto designs. – Michael C Dec 29 '17 at 7:57
1

Ease of manufacturing and similar zoom ranges. In a fairly simple lens, the f/stop is going to decrease as the lens is extended since they are only as fully open as necessary for the short end and as they lengthen the focal length, the same size opening becomes a slower and slower aperture since it is based on the ratio of focal length to aperture opening.

Since the kit lenses typically don't bother to go to f/3.5 or f/4 is relatively cheap to make compared to f/2.8 and they do it for the wide side of the lens and the 5.6 follows naturally due to the distance to the long end of the focal length range. This is also why the one f/2.8 you mentioned shifts by roughly a stop on both ends. The range is still the same, but they decided to go for a bigger aperture compared to the wide end of the lens.

| improve this answer | |
  • As a zoom lens is extended, the relationship of the front elements/groups increases the magnification between the front of the lens and the diaphragm, which causes the entrance pupil (or effective aperture) to increase for the same size diaphragm opening. Otherwise the same 5.14mm opening required for f/3.5 at 18mm would yield an f-number of 10.7 at 55mm focal length. – Michael C Sep 27 '13 at 7:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.