15
\$\begingroup\$

I like to shoot city and landscapes. I saw that photographers often use tripod even during a day. Why would I need a tripod during a day, if I can get shutter speed like 1/125s even with low ISO? And I'm not going to need multiple shots (eg. for HDR or time-lapse)

Improve this question
\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ 1/125 isn't even that fast. And critical to this equation is your focal length. Change this question to be 1/500 and 50mm and it is completely different. Are you sure in daylight you are really only using 1/125? Really, the reasons are endless. But it is a tradeoff, extra weight, time, etc. \$\endgroup\$
    – dpollitt
    Commented Jan 18, 2013 at 18:59
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Take a landscape wiht and without tripod. Do a large image and you will see the difference. The picture will tell you why it is better to use the tripod \$\endgroup\$
    – user15737
    Commented Jan 22, 2013 at 19:35

4 Answers 4

Reset to default
25
\$\begingroup\$

There is a rule in photography: If you can use a tripod, do it.

OK, I just made it up but let me tell you why it is a good idea:

  • Stability: No matter how fast your shutter-speed is going to be, a good tripod can do better. There is a rule-of-thumb that says you need a certain shutter-speed (1/focal-length) get a sharp enough image but it does not guarantee one.
  • Creativity: A tripod lets you shoot at low shutter-speeds. Even though you could shoot faster, you may not want to. Maybe you want more depth-of-field or blurred motion.
  • Precision: With a tripod you can set your camera position exactly and it stays there. Getting your camera level and keeping it level is much easier with a tripod. Plus, with the camera fixed there, you can take the time to check all your edges and composition without the view shifting as you do it.
  • Repetition: You obviously know that HDR or time-lapse require repetition of precise framing but those aren't the only case where this can be useful. You may have taken the time to perfectly frame your shot only to suddenly have something unwanted move into the frame. With the camera firmly on the tripod, you can take the same exact shot after the unwanted element has been removed.
  • Self-Inclusion: With a tripod you can put yourself in the frame. You can try camera tossing instead but you cannot control framing that way.
  • Panoramas: Try rotating around the nodal-point without a tripod! It is much easier to get all the shots you need with a tripod and even easier with a specialized head with marked positions.
Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
4
  • 13
    \$\begingroup\$ I'm not sure where it fits into this list, but I've another point to add: I always argue that using a tripod forces me to slow the whole process and be more conscious of the shot I'm taking, and I'm therefore more likely to make conscious decisions that will help me get a better shot. \$\endgroup\$
    – Dan Wolfgang
    Commented Jan 18, 2013 at 20:30
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Oh I wish it slowed me down! That's my biggest photographic fault that I know of. \$\endgroup\$
    – Paul Cezanne
    Commented Jan 18, 2013 at 22:45
  • \$\begingroup\$ One of my friends had a tripod that you assembled and disassembled instead of extending and collapsing, maybe you need to get one of those :) \$\endgroup\$
    – Itai
    Commented Jan 18, 2013 at 23:13
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ +1 for the camera toss link. Makes me think how confident I am catching a spinning camera. \$\endgroup\$
    – Rene
    Commented Jan 23, 2013 at 11:43
6
\$\begingroup\$

I do when shooting landscape/buildings for compositional reasons. I compose the shoot just the way I want it and then I wait for the light to be right. It might be a pattern of cloud, or the color of the sky, or the shadows falling around the building. I've been know to wait 45 minutes just sitting on the ground with my wired remote in my hand pressing the button when it looks good.

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
5
\$\begingroup\$

Other than allowing for longer exposure times, a tripod helps really a lot aligning the camera and composing city and landscapes scenes. Keep in mind that those subjects usually require more than one try at the same location, even if you are not planning something like a HDR or time-lapse.

With a tripod you can also use the camera timer (or a remote shutter) instead of manually pressing the shutter button, which minimises camera shake.

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

There is this article, about how to get photos maximally sharp. Rule 1 is to use a tripod at all times. So I guess main reason for most landscape photographers would be sharpness.

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.