2
\$\begingroup\$

When conventional wisdom refers to 85mm as the perfect lens for portraits, it refers to 85mm for a full frame sensor. Is this right? In that case, is it correct to apply the crop factor and say a 55mm F1.8 would be a perfect lens for portraits on an APS-C?

\$\endgroup\$

2 Answers 2

6
\$\begingroup\$

Well, sort of. There's no such thing as absolute equivalence.

In terms of angle of view a 55mm lens will give the same AoV with a 1.5X APS-C sensor as an 85mm lens on a 36x24mm FF camera.

In terms of exposure you'd need a 55mm f/1.8 to get the same AoV and exposure in the same light as an 85mm f/1.8 on a FF.

In terms of depth of field (DoF), you'd need a 55mm f/1.2 to get the same DoF from the same subject distance as you would get with an 85mm f/1.8 lens on a FF camera. The 55mm f/1.8 on an APS-C camera could only match the DoF of an 85mm lens set at f/2.8 on a FF camera.

Of course opening up the aperture to f/1.2 would change the exposure compared to f/1.8, so you'd either need to change the shutter time or the ISO to compensate.

\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

It is correct to say that an 85mm equivalent on an APS-C camera is a ~55mm lens.

However, the perfect portrait lens happens to be the one that gives you the portrait you want at the time. :-)

It's tough to shoot an environmental portrait with an 85mm lens, for example.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.