Timeline for Showing depth of field in a picture [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2017 at 18:35 | history | closed |
mattdm scottbb♦ Michael C Philip Kendall♦ inkista |
Duplicate of How can I maximize the "blurry background, sharp subject" (bokeh) effect?, Maximizing bokeh in the foreground? | |
| Feb 27, 2017 at 16:14 | comment | added | Janardan S | @scottbb Actually English is my second language, I'm from India. I believe anyone can learn fluent English easily, one just needs interest and motivation. | |
| Feb 27, 2017 at 16:10 | comment | added | scottbb♦ | @Janas I prefer to fault the frustratingly exception-laden English language, rather than fault possible ESL speakers for not getting it right. After all, Italian, Spanish, and Portuguese have the word "lente"; German has "linse"; Hungarian has "lencse". So there's plenty of precedent when coming from other languages to assume it should have a final "e". Even for native speakers, a singular noun ending with an "s" sound just begs for a final 'e' (e.g., sense, pretense, offense, license, expense). | |
| Feb 27, 2017 at 16:07 | comment | added | mattdm | .... which means this is well covered by existing questions and answers. | |
| Feb 27, 2017 at 15:48 | answer | added | Linwood | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 27, 2017 at 13:24 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Feb 28, 2017 at 18:39 | |||||
| Feb 27, 2017 at 13:20 | comment | added | osullic | @Alaskaman I think it is the opposite | |
| Feb 27, 2017 at 10:45 | comment | added | Janardan S | @user61127 i really hope people would remember the spelling of lens. 'LENS', not 'LENSE' | |
| Feb 27, 2017 at 9:25 | answer | added | Crowley | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 27, 2017 at 5:54 | history | edited | mattdm |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 27, 2017 at 4:31 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 28, 2017 at 18:35 | |||||
| Feb 27, 2017 at 3:51 | comment | added | user61127 | I guess that I want to know the lense settings that bring out the most vivid depth of field in a picture. I hope this helps explaining my question. | |
| Feb 27, 2017 at 3:40 | answer | added | Caleb | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 27, 2017 at 3:35 | comment | added | Alaska Man | It sounds like he/she wants to maximize the depth of field | |
| Feb 27, 2017 at 3:33 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Feb 27, 2017 at 3:43 | |||||
| Feb 27, 2017 at 3:29 | comment | added | Linwood | Could you perhaps elaborate a bit. Are you asking how one produces a shallow depth of field (hence blurring what is not the main in-focus subject), or are you asking about post-processing an image to try to achieve a 3D effect of some sort after the fact? Or are you asking about artistic techniques (e.g. leading lines) that might provide a sense of depth? I ask because you first asked a question, then made a statement that seemed to answer it -- so what exactly are you asking? | |
| Feb 27, 2017 at 3:19 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 27, 2017 at 5:13 | |||||
| Feb 27, 2017 at 3:17 | history | asked | user61127 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |