Timeline for Visible discrete gradient transitions of glow on photos with long exposure
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
26 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2018 at 15:47 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jun 6, 2018 at 3:06 | |||||
| May 31, 2018 at 15:31 | comment | added | mattdm | Possible duplicate of How to get a smooth gradient on sky? | |
| May 31, 2018 at 14:26 | answer | added | Sherwood Botsford | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 19, 2018 at 19:20 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Apr 19, 2018 at 18:26 | comment | added | scottbb♦ | The link to the NEF is broken | |
| Apr 19, 2018 at 17:16 | answer | added | Steven Kersting | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 1, 2018 at 2:10 | answer | added | Lowell Montgomery | timeline score: 0 | |
| S Mar 22, 2018 at 14:47 | history | suggested | Husam Mohamed | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
imrpoved grammar + added tags
|
| Mar 22, 2018 at 6:33 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 22, 2018 at 14:47 | |||||
| Feb 1, 2018 at 22:12 | comment | added | Sherwood Botsford | Are you sure this isn't an artifact of a not very good monitor? I can't see any banding at all on my monitor on either the black sky or the light to dark grey transition on the roofs. Create a gradient in photo shop covering approximately the same range and see if your monitor bands that. | |
| Dec 25, 2017 at 9:12 | history | edited | Euri Pinhollow | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Clarify wordings.
|
| Dec 24, 2017 at 18:05 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhotos/status/944992438199967744 | ||
| Dec 24, 2017 at 17:54 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jul 9, 2016 at 22:08 | history | edited | downey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Apr 7, 2016 at 9:50 | comment | added | lharby | Very nice pic btw | |
| Apr 5, 2016 at 12:37 | answer | added | Euri Pinhollow | timeline score: -2 | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 8:54 | comment | added | downey | @MichaelClark I meant the gradient in the sky. I updated the question as well | |
| Nov 18, 2015 at 8:54 | history | edited | downey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 30 characters in body
|
| Nov 18, 2015 at 3:47 | comment | added | Michael C | @downey It is still unclear exactly what the "pixel by pixel" glow to which you refer in your question is talking about. Are you referring to the rough gradients between various shades of gray/black in the sky? The loss of details in the bright areas of the buildings? Something else? | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 22:15 | comment | added | downey | Hi, I added a link to the original NEF file to my origin question.. Thank you for your answer, actually, I am not sure if this is the quality of the photo I should expect.. But when you see the NEF file, is it better (maybe with better settings) | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 22:04 | history | edited | downey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 269 characters in body
|
| Nov 17, 2015 at 16:51 | comment | added | Digital Lightcraft | Do you mean in the sky where the shading is banded? That appears to be due to VERY high JPG compression, indeed when i view it at 100% the quality is shocking for a D7100... | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 16:13 | answer | added | Alan Marcus | timeline score: -1 | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 14:58 | history | edited | downey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 35 characters in body
|
| Nov 17, 2015 at 14:42 | review | First posts | |||
| Nov 18, 2015 at 4:20 | |||||
| Nov 17, 2015 at 14:42 | history | asked | downey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |