Timeline for Why do photos look best without any sharpening?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2012 at 15:15 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 15 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Apr 4, 2011 at 18:31 | vote | accept | Andres | ||
| Apr 4, 2011 at 1:17 | comment | added | Itai | Where are you looking at your photos? Sharpening is supposed to be dependent on the output medium. Also if you are looking at images at anything other than 100% (including full-screen) your software is doing its own interpolation. This will clearly affect how you perceive sharpening. | |
| Apr 4, 2011 at 1:10 | comment | added | Itai | @mattdm - It's only temporary, I showed some halos on my in-law's TV and he says he sees them everywhere now. Once you point out something you can't take it away ;) | |
| Apr 3, 2011 at 23:20 | comment | added | mattdm | There does seem to be some sort of cultural blindness to oversharpening. My new flatscreen TV has a setting from 0-100, and comes at 50. Everything higher than 10 has really disturbuting-to-my-eye halos. | |
| Apr 3, 2011 at 22:55 | comment | added | Andres | Nope, I shoot mostly in RAW. | |
| Apr 3, 2011 at 17:17 | answer | added | eflorico | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 3, 2011 at 4:13 | comment | added | Itai | Got to ask, are you double-sharpening? If you are working from JPEG, your camera may have sharpened things nicely already and you are sharpening the sharpened-result which may look rather strange. | |
| Apr 2, 2011 at 21:51 | answer | added | labnut | timeline score: 15 | |
| Apr 2, 2011 at 21:48 | history | edited | Andres | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 116 characters in body
|
| Apr 2, 2011 at 21:08 | answer | added | user2719 | timeline score: 12 | |
| Apr 2, 2011 at 21:01 | answer | added | PearsonArtPhoto | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 2, 2011 at 20:44 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhotos/status/54283034970701824 | ||
| Apr 2, 2011 at 20:23 | history | edited | ahockley | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
spelling
|
| Apr 2, 2011 at 19:59 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited tags; edited title
|
| Apr 2, 2011 at 19:54 | history | asked | Andres | CC BY-SA 2.5 |