Timeline for Why are the Becher typologies considered artistically valuable?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2018 at 1:24 | comment | added | AJ Henderson♦ | @osullic Answers that are based on well founded opinions with support are NOT banned. I suggest taking a look at Good Subjective/Bad Subjective. | |
| Sep 21, 2018 at 4:16 | vote | accept | x-terminate | ||
| Sep 21, 2018 at 4:06 | answer | added | Michael C | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 21, 2018 at 2:16 | comment | added | jrista | It sounds like the wording of this question needs to be improved. I think there is merit to the underlying question that is really being asked, however I don't think that is as clear as it could be to prospective answerers. @x-terminate, can you try to improve your question so it is clearer and more obvious what you are specifically asking? | |
| Sep 21, 2018 at 0:20 | comment | added | xiota | @x-terminate I meant, edit the question to include the appropriate background information. | |
| Sep 20, 2018 at 23:20 | comment | added | mattdm | As I noted elsewhere, Wikipedia articles tend to be fairly poor on impact and legacy of particular photographic work. They're instead are good for finding signs of importance, like notable exhibitions or presence in museums. Often one can collect a lot of useful knowledge from articles on museum sites and from art magazines, but it's not exactly trivial to synthesize if you don't already have more than passing familiarity. | |
| Sep 20, 2018 at 22:37 | comment | added | x-terminate | Sure, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernd_and_Hilla_Becher although I don't see the point so much - the idea is for people who are familiar with the concept to provide their take on it, otherwise what's the point - I can read what wikipedia says about their work myself. | |
| Sep 20, 2018 at 22:35 | comment | added | xiota | It would be nice if you explain what "Bechler typologies" are and how they relate to photography to give some context to the question. Even just a few links for further reading would have been helpful. | |
| Sep 20, 2018 at 21:54 | comment | added | x-terminate | @osullic - It is indeed an art-related question but it addresses a specific series of works in the medium of photography, and unless it is your position that all art works are valued along a single criteria that is beyond verbal representation I'd say it's a well-posed one. | |
| S Sep 20, 2018 at 20:50 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Sep 20, 2018 at 21:01 | |||||
| S Sep 20, 2018 at 20:50 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 24, 2018 at 12:47 | |||||
| Sep 20, 2018 at 20:35 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 21, 2018 at 2:38 | |||||
| Sep 20, 2018 at 20:30 | history | asked | x-terminate | CC BY-SA 4.0 |