New answers tagged

2

After comments & question edit I'm still only concentrating on the first 2 images, as a single question. The others ought to be separated out. At exposure times of 2.5s & 0.5s respectively, I'd have definitely used some method to increase the amount of light captured - lift ISO, open aperture, or extend exposure time - whichever adds least extra work....


2

I do not think this artifact is caused by reflections in the optical path. I think this is due to software correction of light falloff as a function of distance from image center (i.e., vignetting compensation). Normally such correction is not very noticeable because the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is high enough. But in this case, the image is so dark, that ...


6

That very much looks like a reflection of the lens on the protective glass to me... along with another reflection from something outside. It does not look like banding due to editing. This is the kind of thing one might see with an SLR lens that has an uncoated filter on it. IDT there is anything you can really do about it. In more normal conditions it is ...


Top 50 recent answers are included