New answers tagged astrophotography
2
Another aspect of selecting chips for space duty is radiation. Spacecraft that venture beyond low earth orbit are subjected to much higher levels of radiation which cause all sorts of problems. This limits the use of many high performance IC's.
4
Notice the order in which the specs of the cameras are given by NASA here:
Function
Location on the rover
Mass (which is always critical on a space probe)
Power (energy consumption)
Size
Data return (the amount of data generated by the device)
Color quality
Image resolution
Function obviously includes an expectation of long term reliability. Mass, energy ...
2
There is a very long lead time between procuring equipment (sensor in this case) and actually using it (on Mars).
It has to be obtained and tested against extreme reliability parameters of cold, heat, radiation, vacuum, vibration. Then it can be years before it actually flies. A newer sensor cannot be trusted as a substitute without undergoing all of the ...
1
They're out of focus stars, with maybe a planet thrown in.
If they were ghosting, due to internal reflections inside your lens, the shape of all of them would be more uniform and the reflections would be 'flipped' directly across the center of the (uncropped) image from the actual light source(s). But a close examination of each reveals that the shapes are ...
2
The combination of color cast and differing brightness of the "ghost" images is telltale for internal reflections in a coated lens. It's not necessarily a sign of low quality optics or sensor, but it's characteristic of a bright light source in frame on a dark field -- making the reflections (typically 1% or less of the brightness of the main ...
Top 50 recent answers are included
