Why does a smaller aperture size have a high depth of field? What is the physics behind this?
\$\begingroup\$
\$\endgroup\$
3
-
1\$\begingroup\$ @PhilipKendall This isn't a duplicate. The linked answer states the aperture results in DoF but this person already knows it, and is asking about the physics behind it. \$\endgroup\$– Hairy DresdenCommented Mar 16, 2018 at 15:30
-
\$\begingroup\$ @HairyDresden - a) the OP has the premise in reverse & b) did you look at the 2nd answer on the dupe? \$\endgroup\$– TetsujinCommented Mar 16, 2018 at 15:41
-
1\$\begingroup\$ We do have the technical question too. \$\endgroup\$– mattdmCommented Mar 16, 2018 at 16:05
Add a comment
|
1 Answer
\$\begingroup\$
\$\endgroup\$
1
Why does a smaller aperture size have a low depth of field?
It doesn't; you've got it backward. Decreasing aperture size increases depth of field.
What might be confusing you is that smaller f-numbers indicate larger apertures. For example, an aperture setting of f/2 indicates a larger aperture than does f/2.8.
-
\$\begingroup\$ I edited the question. Sorry my bad! \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 16, 2018 at 16:12