4
\$\begingroup\$

I've decided to buy an Olympus OM D M10 mkii as my first serious camera, however I now have to decide which lens to get which it. The cheapest option is with the 14-42mm ii r, which is 20 euros less than the 14-42mm Objective. But what's the difference? Is it relevant for a beginner?

Improve this question
\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ 14-42 or 12-42? The header says one thing, the body says the other? \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Mar 13, 2018 at 11:24
  • \$\begingroup\$ Note: There is no 12-42mm II R \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Mar 13, 2018 at 13:17

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
2
\$\begingroup\$

The main difference is in the size of each lens.

enter image description here

  • The ED 14-42mm F3.5-5.6 EZ is often called a "pancake" lens. It is very compact when stowed in the unused position.

But in use the center of the lens extends.

enter image description here

There's a lot more in terms of optics inside this one than your average "pancake" lens:

enter image description here

  • The 14-42mm F3.5-5.6 II R looks like a more typical type lens with a 50mm or so barrel length in the "stowed" position.

It too extends and is almost twice that length when in use.

enter image description here

You don't give up anything in the way of image quality in exchange for the compactness of the pancake when compared to the other lens, but you don't really gain anything either. Comparing the two lenses at various focal lengths and apertures at imaging resource gives a slight advantage to one in some places, and to the other in other places. All of the variation could very well be within the range of cop-to-copy variation of two copies of the same model of either lens. Overall the "EZ" may be just a bit sharper than the "II R", but it is not decisively so.

The "EZ" has a power motor that automatically retracts the lens when the camera's power is turned off and automatically extends the lens when the camera is turned on. The lens also zooms using this powered motor via a 'fly-by-wire' connected zoom ring. The "II R" has a more traditional mechanically connected zoom ring that the user must operated themselves after moving an 'Unlock' switch to stow the lens in the compact position.

Both lenses use a 'focus-by-wire' system for manual focusing. The "II R" has a wider, easier to use manual focusing ring. The "EZ" has a very narrow focusing ring at the very front of the main lens barrel with very little separation between the focusing ring and the 'zoom-by-wire' ring just behind it.

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
3
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ 100% subjective, but I personally think that motor zoom would be very divisive. I loved the small size of that lens, but hated the twist to zoom electronic function. \$\endgroup\$
    – AthomSfere
    Mar 13, 2018 at 12:44
  • \$\begingroup\$ @AthomSfere Divisive or decisive? \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Mar 13, 2018 at 12:58
  • \$\begingroup\$ Divisive. I assume everyone will love or hate the motor. No clue what the split ratio would be \$\endgroup\$
    – AthomSfere
    Mar 13, 2018 at 13:02
1
\$\begingroup\$

Pancake is better for filming, but for (movement) photography, this old big plastic is better - When u have pancake mounted u can't count on fast change of focal lenght, which is sometimes croucious.

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.