This summer, I'll be participating in a pioneer handcart trek, where everyone is encouraged to wear period clothing (mid 1800s). I'd like to add an antique camera to my costume, but make it functionally digital, since we're hiking 20+ miles with space limitations. I have an action camera (Campark, not GoPro - because it's only 10% of the price) and old cameras as patterns, but no intent do destroy them...but maybe craft something similar.

Has anyone seen a project using a bellows housing with the action camera sitting at the front...and a trigger at the back? If I'm the first to think of this, odd as that would be, do you have suggestions for how to proceed?

Another Idea I had was to make a twin-lens reflex camera housing so it looks old (millennial kids won't have a clue) and I can invert the display and use a mirror to look down into the box and see the display.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Not sure about the bellows idea - but it seems like it wouldn't be too large of an effort to rig the TLR so that pushing the shutter button pushes the shutter on the Campark. I'd personally remove the bottom lens and try to slot the Campark lens in it's place. Leave the top lens alone so you still get that old world, seeing the world reversed view before snapping a shot. \$\endgroup\$
    – OnBreak.
    Commented Jan 23, 2018 at 21:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ More details about your camera would be helpful: what ports does it have? Mount points? Size and weight? If it has USB, what PTP commands does it support? Also the antiques cameras you're thinking of using: how much space is there to put extra electronics inside? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 24, 2018 at 9:03
  • \$\begingroup\$ Rather than destroy the old camera, I'm leaning toward creating an aesthetic duplicate. Bellows won't have to be light tight, but they should look/function similarly (collapsing for storage). This may be exposed to rain, wind, dust, river, etc.. It's for show. If it's going to rain, I'll stow it and move the action camera into its waterproof housing. USB is likely limited, and I only considered using that with an external power pack to gain more life. Mount points are a clip-on 1/4-20 thread, but nothing native on the camera...so I'd probably slide the camera into a wood channel. \$\endgroup\$
    – dtphoto
    Commented Jan 24, 2018 at 19:26
  • \$\begingroup\$ dtphoto - don't forget to call Pete's attention back to this by @ tagging him: @PeterTaylor \$\endgroup\$
    – OnBreak.
    Commented Jan 24, 2018 at 19:36
  • \$\begingroup\$ "(millennial kids won't have a clue)" - Please, please don't use that as an excuse to render people even more clueless by subjecting them to anachronistic impressions yourself. ;) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 25, 2018 at 6:41

1 Answer 1


Bellows won't have to be light tight, but they should look/function similarly (collapsing for storage).

This seems to constrain your choice of antique body ("host") considerably, because when the bellows are collapsed the action camera will protrude backwards into the host. Something like a folding pocket Kodak would probably not be big enough. Since you say you'll be hiking 20 miles with space limitations, I presume you don't want a 40cm wooden box like this one from the 1850s.

However, a shorter version of that design does have some things to recommend it.

  • The lens only takes up a small part of the front area of the bellows, which is convenient given that (based on the models I've looked at) the lens on your action camera probably takes up less than 25% of the front area.

    That, coupled with the fact that your camera is probably rectangular whereas the bellows are square, suggests that extra electronics can be hidden on top of the action camera. That way they don't contribute to the depth to which it protrudes into the host.

  • You don't have to worry about damaging mirrors because there aren't any.

  • It's clearly an authentic design for the time period, unlike (say) a Rolleiflex or a Graflex Speed Graphic.

USB is likely limited

Looking at the Campark website, most of their action cameras seem to support Wifi remote control. That is suggestive that they may well support basic PTP. If you have or are willing to spend time acquiring the necessary skills, I would think that it is worth a simple test where you plug the camera into a computer and try to take an exposure with gphoto, ptpcam, or something similar. If that works then my suggestion would be an Arduino project which uses a microswitch at the back of the host as the trigger to send PTP commands to the action camera.

Note: my personal experience with PTP is using Raspberry Pi rather than Arduino, and the ptpcam link above is to my fork which I know compiles for Pi. I'm suggesting Arduino because it should be smaller, and I believe that it has the necessary hardware. However, you should probably have a look on our sister site about Arduino and if necessary ask which models are capable of being USB hosts. A quick search turns up an Arduino PTP library, and a more thorough search might find one or two more.

I'd probably slide the camera into a wood channel.

If your woodworking skills are good enough, that's fine; but it might be easier to get the precision using 3D printing for parts which aren't externally visible.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.