Can anyone help? I am using a nikon d7000 for sports photography. My husband kindly bought me a sigma 70-200mm telephoto lens 2.8 as I shoot a lot of low light indoor sports. I have only just started testing it but I am finding that it will not focus in some low light situations. I am keen to know what the best settings to use would be for low light indoor sports. I often get a blur with my 3.5 lens.

  • 1
    There's motion blur, and out-of-focus blur. It appears you are talking about the camera's inability to acquire focus because of low light. Can you confirm which you mean?
    – Greg
    Mar 5, 2011 at 17:38
  • Hard to answer this question because the available light differs considerably from one venue to the other. I shoot indoor sports now and then but in some cases there just isn't enough light to get any pleasing results.
    – Rene
    Oct 30, 2012 at 7:46

7 Answers 7


Indoor sports photography is a big challenge. You're going to have to be shooting wide open likely in high ISO ranges. If you can set up a remote flash somewhere to pick the scene up a couple stops you'll likely be better off.

I've got a Canon 70-200 f/2.8 and it was really tough to stop the motion (~1/500-1/1000) even at the high school level without getting up to 1600 ISO.

  • My pleasure. Hope you find the combination of things that work. Shooting sports photography can be quite exciting! Plus gives you another excuse to go to sporting events!
    – Brian
    Mar 6, 2011 at 12:34

Well, the three values that matter are aperture, shutter speed, and ISO. All of these are in your control, but only if you know what they do for you. I apologize if you know all this, but others may ask the same question, so...

Aperture - This is the ratio of the focal length of the lens to the diameter of its opening. The smaller the aperture number, the bigger the opening, the bigger the opening, the more light it gathers for any given shutter speed. However, typically the more wide open a lens is, the less sharp it is, there's a "sweet" spot that varies a little by lens and sensor size. In any case, in very low light, you're going to want to be wide open or very close to it.

Shutter Speed - Well, this obvious, but it's important to note that when you do not control the light, then the shutter speed is what freezes motion. So, depending on the sport, you're probably going to be anywhere from 1/500s and above to freeze motion.

ISO - The sensitivity to light of the sensor. Low ISO is less sensitive, but usually much less noisy. High ISO is much more sensitive, but also noisy. Nevertheless, in a low light situation, even with the lens wide open, the ISO is going to be at the high side. The good news is that the D7000 is very strong at high ISO, you can get very nice images at 6400 and not bad at 12,800 with a little work.

So, as to specific recommendations... I would shoot using shutter priority or, more preferrably manual with auto ISO enabled. Ideally, I would want to control my aperture and shutter speed and let the camera pick the ISO if the light tends to change a bit (you do have a camera that gives you a lot of latitude in ISO). If the light is constant, I might go fully manual and set all three values, it just depends.

  • I would recommend using the quote environment to highlight the last paragraph. It is the part you really want to stand out.
    – BBischof
    Mar 5, 2011 at 15:30
  • 1
    @bbischof but who is that quoting? seems an unnatural use of the markdown. If you want to highlight that section, there are markdown options that make more sense, such as ** to bold the opening phrase. Abusing the quote markdown to highlight your own words seems... wrong.
    – cabbey
    Mar 6, 2011 at 7:43
  • Thanks for your comments. Still very new to ISO and aperture settings but the more I use the camera the more I learn. Whenever I have taken sports photos before I have normally set the aperture and the iso is set automatically. I will have to practice a little first I think. I have a mini pod so I can at least minimize as much movement as possible but as light is low and not always constant, it takes a bit of fine tuning to get it right.
    – user4170
    Mar 6, 2011 at 10:38
  • @cabbey whoa, your are really putting a lot of thought into these environments. I think this is useful, so I recommend it. I learned the trick from other SE users and sites. I find that it increases visibility of the really essential part of ones question. While the excess info in a question is undoubtably useful, showing readers the heart of it, helps. But I don't give much thought to environment names, for instance, when using boldface I do not feel emboldened. :/
    – BBischof
    Mar 6, 2011 at 21:38
  • 1
    It's standard gramatical markup thinking really, nothing special about stack exchange. Crawlers like google and yahoo understand blockquote, strong, and emphasis tags. They have an internet wide agreed upon meaning that you're ignoring because you want the side effect rendering difference.
    – cabbey
    Mar 7, 2011 at 19:34

Autofocus on a camera requires enough light for the electronics to pick out distinct edges in the subject.

In daylight it's pretty easy because the changes from shadows to lit areas, or patterns in clothing, or the difference in tone between the subject and the background, help the camera.

It's easy to test how the camera determines how to focus by trying to focus on a monochromatic surface, i.e., one that has no changes in color. A smooth blank white wall can make a camera nuts because, if there are no changes or edges or shadows, it can't latch onto anything and will just seek a focal point then give up.

Similarly, when the light levels drop it gets hard for the camera to find the edges, because the contrast has dropped too. New cameras use more sensitive sensors to pick up focus, but still, they get fooled once the light gets too low. At that point you can try to help the camera out:

  • Add a bit of artificial light. Some Nikon flashes will turn on a red beam in a vertical pattern, which helps the camera find the edges. Other cameras can turn on a white LED that adds a bit of light, helping it find the edges.
  • Use a small flashlight to illuminate the subject quickly, for the above reasons. A red filter over the bulb might help protect your night vision, be less distraction to others, or might even make the subject stand out to the camera better - I doubt the focus sensor is color, so red might give it better black and white contrast to work from.
  • Focus on something that is well lit and the same distance from the camera as the subject then recompose your shot with the subject without refocusing.
  • Focus manually.

The f2.8 lens gives you two extra stops of light when focusing, compared to a normal consumer lens which is f5.6. The aperture you have selected for the exposure won't matter when focusing because the camera has the aperture wide open until the shutter is released. At that point the aperture is stopped down, the shutter opens, the picture is exposed, the shutter closes, and the aperture opens to full again. You can prove this is what happens by setting a slow exposure, looking into the lens, releasing the shutter, and watching the blades of the lens close down. Once the shutter closes, the blades will reopen to the full aperture of the lens. If you have a depth-of-field preview button, you can press it while looking down the lens barrel and see the same thing occur. The camera does this so the full amount of light is getting down the barrel while you're setting up the shot and focusing.

I have shot a lot of fast action in lousy light, and acquiring and maintaining focus can be a real problem. I'm using a Canon f2.8 70-200 also, and had to figure out how to quickly find something on the subject that would help the camera acquire and track focus. Once I had focus I could fire, and my strobe system would provide enough light for the right exposure. There were plenty of "hail Mary" shots, where I hoped it had focus because I could barely see - I'd prefocus then wait for the subject to get to that distance then fire, which is an old trick from the days of manual focus. At least the exposures looked good because of the strobes though often the action looked horrible.

It's a tough trade-off and the best answer is to practice with the camera in similar situations so you have your bag of tricks ready when you encounter similar problems while shooting for real.

  • 1
    +1 It's always great to hear from people who are sharing their experience with us. (BTW, f5.6 to f2.8 is two stops, not one.)
    – whuber
    Mar 5, 2011 at 19:43
  • @whuber, Doh! You're right. I'll update it. Thanks.
    – Greg
    Mar 6, 2011 at 0:12

Sigma 70-200mm is very inconsistent in the AutoFocus department and well known for major focus problems. Life is good when it focuses right, but a sharp lens will not delivery sharp images if not focused properly. You might consider getting another copy of the lens. If possible, get Nikon 70-200 f/2.8 which is more likely to solve your problem. Just so you know, its okay for your camera to hunt a little bit in low light conditions unless you buy a top end piece of optics. In this case, bumping up ISO seems to be the best option for you.

EDIT: Bumping up ISO solely isn't gonna solve the issue, bumping up the ISO gives you chance to use smaller aperture and most lenses perform better when stepped down. I personally never used the Sigma 70-200mm but when my lens starts hunting, I generally bump the ISO up and use a smaller aperture, this solves the issue most of the case.

Thanks to rfusca for pointing it out.

  • 1
    How would bumping up the ISO affect his autofocus issue?...
    – rfusca
    Mar 6, 2011 at 5:25
  • Bumping up ISO solely isn't gonna solve the issue, bumping up the ISO gives you chance to use smaller aperture and most lenses perform better when stepped down. I personally never used the Sigma 70-200mm but when my lens starts hunting, I generally bump the ISO up and use a smaller aperture, this solves the issue most of the case. Mar 6, 2011 at 7:21
  • @Nikkibnakkinoo - sorry? didnt get the 'beim' part. Mar 6, 2011 at 12:00
  • I've a 70-200 Sigma and have no problems with it whatsoever. The one time it did fail to AF it was a dirty contact in the TC I'd bolted to it that caused the AF signal between the camera and the lens to be blocked. Cleaned the contacts and the problem went away.
    – jwenting
    Mar 7, 2011 at 7:38
  • @jwenting, third party lenses typically end up with higher number of bad copies in the production line. I've heard about good copies, bad copies, world-conquering copies of the same lens. If you buy from a physical store you can always try multiple copies before you buy but not everyone get this chance. Mar 7, 2011 at 8:12

I have been setting the camera to manual exposure with f/4 and shutter 1/1250 and auto ISO on the basis of getting best aperture/shutter combination and the camera setting ISO as the cameras now have higher ISO settings.

I have been pleased with JPEGs which were strong and sharp.

I have tried aperture priority with fixed ISO but get exposure problems when sun pops out or those dark clouds appear.


Make sure you are using Continuous Servo AF, which is displayed as AF-C. That means it is continually focusing on a moving subject, instead of focusing once then waiting for you to take the photo. With AF-C, the D7000 will determine what the subject is, focus on it, and keep it in focus as it moves. This is especially important in sports photography where your subject is moving around alot.


A shutter speed of at least 500 is recommended for sports photography

  • 1
    Why? Recommended by whom? For which sports? What should you do if you can't get the shutter speed so high?
    – mattdm
    Aug 25, 2013 at 19:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy