So I bought an Omega D2 enlarger for making 8x10 prints out of my 4x5 negatives at home. I have had two unsolved issues with it that make me question whether it is really suitable for 4x5 printing.

  1. Lens length: Originally I had a ~130mm lens on it, but that meant that the edges of my prints were not in focus. So I bought a 180mm lens. However, because the bellows only extend so far, in order to focus the 180mm lens I have to raise the head so high that I crop out a lot of the image. I could have done this with the 130mm lens to crop out the parts that were not in focus, so this is not an improvement.

  2. Head circle radius: The bottom of the head has a circle that does not quite allow for a 4x5 negative, meaning the corners of my 4x5s are cut off. I can adjust it so that the loss is fairly small, but I still have to crop a bit of my image to compensate for enlarger vignetting.

Is my setup still incorrect? Are these problems solvable? Or is the D2's ability to print 4x5 negatives exaggerated?

2 Answers 2


As a rule-of-thumb the focal length lens mounted should be equal to greater than the diagonal measure of the negative to be printed. For the 4X5 negative this works out to 6.4 inches = 160mm (rounded). Think about buying a shorter enlarger lens.

In the meantime, you can mount a camera close-up lens to the 180mm. Such a lens will effectively shorten the focal length.

The math for a +1 added to the 180mm Convert the 180mm to the diopter unit = 1/180 X 1000 = 5.556 diopter power

The +1 is stated in diopter power

Add the two diopter powers = 5.5556 +1.0 = 6.556 system total diopter power

Convert 6.556 to millimeters = 1/6.556 X 1000 = 153mm

To see what a +1 addition will do: Go to the drugstore and buy a pair of +1 reading glasses. Hold one of the lenses under your 180mm and compose and focus. This will show you how a 150mm will behave.

The +1 addition won’t make you happy as the reading glass quality lens will degrade. A photo grade achromatic +1 might suite your need but a 150mm quality enlarger lens is not that expensive.

  • But a plus one will then give me a focal length shorter than needed, right? 153mm < 160mm. This may or may not solve my focus issue, but it seems like it will not solve the head circle size issue.
    – steel
    Sep 8, 2017 at 16:41
  • If you can find a + .5 then 5.5556 + 0.5 = 6.06d = 165mm This is just a test procedure so you can see the effect of a given focal length. With a +1 the total is a little short but you can see the effect of a 150mm. Sep 8, 2017 at 16:45
  • The head issue could be you have the wrong condenser package but this is unlikely. It is what it is! Sep 8, 2017 at 16:52
  • I believe I've figured out the answer. Please see my post and let me know what you think?
    – steel
    Sep 8, 2017 at 18:33
  • The elongated lens cone is spot-on. However, the enlarger will be near the top of the column when making an 8x10. Likely the foam is old and distorted in shape, you can fabricate a replacement with window weather-stripping. Sep 8, 2017 at 20:36

So I've figured out both issues. The short answer is yes, this enlarger really will work for 4x5.

The longer answer:

  1. Lens length: Omega D2 enlargers require you to change the length of your lens cone with the length of your lens. This is why I can't focus with the 180mm lens, since I have a 2 3/4" length lens cone, which works for my 135mm lens.

    Solution: get a longer lens cone, like a 4 5/4".

  2. Condenser circle is too small, causing vignetting: My condense has a ring of foam around the bottom. This foam sat inside the condenser circle, blocking part of the light and causing the issue.

    Solution: Remove foam from bottom of condenser. Block light with a small piece of fabric wrapped where the condenser meets the negative holder.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.