18
\$\begingroup\$

I'm aware of two devices that can extend the reach of a lens: the teleconverter and the extension tubes. What else would they have in common, and where do they differ?

Are there situations where one would be preferable over the other?

\$\endgroup\$
1

3 Answers 3

26
\$\begingroup\$

The two devices do entirely different things.

Extension tube:

  • An empty tube which moves the lens further away from the sensor.
  • The point is that as you focus on closer and closer objects, the focused image (which you want to place on the sensor) moves further from the lens. Eventually the lens reaches the limit of its travel and closer objects focus behind the sensor. Adding an extension tube gives you more room to do this, so you can focus on closer objects.

Teleconverter:

  • Contains optical elements which increase the focal length of your lens.
  • As a consequence, the maximum aperture shrinks (making the lens slower).
  • For example, a 300mm f/2.8 with a 1.4x TC becomes a 420mm f/4 (you lose one stop), and with a 2x TC it becomes a 600mm f/5.6 (you lose two stops).
  • Typically, TCs work best with telephoto lenses.
  • Teleconverters can make autofocus stop working by reducing the maximum aperture beyond the limit of the autofocus system (often f/5.6). For example, adding a 2x TC to a f/4 lens results in a f/8 lens, which probably won't autofocus.
  • Also, adding elements to a lens degrades its quality somewhat; this may or may not be a visible problem. Generally, you will want a lens and TC which are designed to work together to minimize this issue.

Both (if good-quality) contain mechanics and electronics to let the lens and body "talk", to keep auto-focus and metering working.

\$\endgroup\$
6
\$\begingroup\$

An extension tube has no optical components. It's role is to move the lens further away from film/sensor. This results in a "closer" focus, which makes it more ideal for macro photography. The downside is that with some extension tubes you lose AF, and with all tubes, you require more light for the exposure, as light falloff becomes an issue.

A teleconverter, increase the focal length of a lens. Common TC are 1.4x and 2.0 multipliers. The TC has optical elements which increases the zoom range of certain lenses (not all lenses will work with a TC). The downside is a reducing in the maximum aperture of the lens and some degradation in overall image quality. TC's are a low-cost way to go "long" with your telephoto lenses. When you need the extra reach of a super telephoto lens, pairing a TC with an existing telephoto lens is a very economical solution, at the expense of optical quality, a darker view finder, and potentially manual focus only scenario (most bodies lose AF abilities unless the lens has a certain max aperture)

\$\endgroup\$
3
\$\begingroup\$

A teleconverter and an extension tube are pretty much each others opposite.

A teleconverter is used to increase the focal length, for example turning a 70-200 zoom into a 140-400 zoom. It has lenses to preserve the characteristics of the lens.

An extension tube is used for macro photo, turning a standard lens into a macro lens by reducing the closest focusing distance (and reducing the longest focusing distance also).

So, if you want to take images at a long distance, you can use a teleconverter, and if you want to take extreme close-ups, you can use an extension tube.

(You could even use both, but they don't cancel each other out, you still end up with a macro lens.)

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.