How do the heads of tripods and monopods differ from each other?

Are some able to be used on both types of support systems? Or is it just tripod heads and monopod heads?

I'm trying to categorise heads for support systems, and would like to know if some can be used for both purposes? Or are they separate like oil and water?

  • What problem are you trying to solve? Do you need a head for a tripod or for a monopod? What types of subjects do you desire to photograph? Static scenes or dynamic scenes?
    – Michael C
    Dec 30, 2016 at 10:51
  • The question is not specific to a problem. It's a general question. I am looking to categorise heads for tripods, monopods or both. Dec 30, 2016 at 10:59

2 Answers 2


There's a lot of overlap in terms of what can be used with each type of support. In general both tripods and monopods use a standard 3/8" bolt to connect to the heads attached to them. So pretty much any head that can be attached to a tripod can also be attached to a monopod and vice versa.

But monopods and tripods tend to be used differently and thus the requirements for a head vary as well.

In practice most monopod users either attach the camera or lens directly to the monopod or use a tilt head that only rotates on one axis. It is normally attached so that it affords the user to tilt the camera up or down with respect to the leg of the monopod. The Manfrotto 234RC is a very popular monopod head.

enter image description here

The nature of a monopod allows panning right to left or left to right simply by rotating the single leg. Most lenses used with a monopod have a lens collar which allows the lens and camera to rotate from landscape to portrait orientation via the tripod collar. This is often the case because one of the chief reasons for using a monopod is to help support the weight of a heavy lens. So only the up/down axis usually needs a point of rotation with a monopod head.

enter image description here

Tripods, on the other hand, are more static. Their three legs make them self-supporting. And although a lens collar can be used to rotate from landscape to portrait orientation when a lens with a tripod collar is attached to a tripod, there are a lot of lenses that have no tripod collars and the camera is attached directly to the tripod head. Although tripods are sometimes used to help support a heavy lens, they are mainly used to eliminate camera movement. Many of the cameras mounted on tripods have smaller, lighter lenses without tripod collars and so it is the camera itself that is attached to the tripod head. Most of the various types of heads commonly used on tripods allow for movement on all three axes: pan left<-->right, pan up<-->down, and rotate from landscape to portrait orientation. Ball heads are popular with tripods. So are "three-way" heads.

Ball headthree way pan head

There are also other types of heads, such as gimbal heads. Pistol grip heads are a special kind of ball head. All of these heads allow the camera/lens to be pointed in many different directions without moving the legs of the tripod.

There are some who use ball heads or pistol grip heads on monopods, but using a head with flexibility in all three axes at the same time can be problematic with a support having only a single leg. This is especially the case with heavier lenses and cameras that are typically supported by monopods. During adjustment of the head you frequently need one hand to hold the camera steady to keep it from flopping over, one hand to operate the adjusting knobs or levers on the head, and your third hand to hold the monopod upright. :-)

This isn't as much an issue with lighter cameras/lenses that are typically attached via the camera rather than the lens. The hand supporting the camera during adjustment can also hold the entire assembly up enough to let the leg dangle in mid-air as the other hand operates the levers/knobs on the ball head. Lighter weight monopods meant for those lightweight cameras are sometimes sold with ball heads.

enter image description here

  • Worth mentioning that one advantage of using a ball head for appropriately sized cameras involves use cases where you're using another vertical object as an aditional "leg" to lean the monopod against; in this situation, you often end up with the tilt of the 'pod not lined up with the z axis. Dec 30, 2016 at 19:25
  • @junkyardsparkle I'm not sure the question even begins to address advantages/disadvantages.
    – Michael C
    Dec 30, 2016 at 20:52
  • @junkyardsparkle The problem you cite is more than adequately solved by a single axis tilt head, such as the one pictured at the top of the answer. You don't need a ball head to adjust a single axis.
    – Michael C
    Dec 30, 2016 at 20:54
  • The point of my comment is that, in that situation, you may well need more than one axis (pitch and roll), since the 'pod will likely be leaning sideways relative to the direction the camera is pointed (unless you want the entire back of the camera to be obscured by a tree trunk you're leaning it against, for example). Dec 30, 2016 at 21:01
  • You can change the the relationship between the optical axis and the adjustment axis on a tilt head. Rather than using it to adjust the "y" axis you can rotate it 90° to use it to adjust the "z" axis. The one pictured will tilt past 90° in either direction.
    – Michael C
    Dec 30, 2016 at 21:03

Michael has a thorough answer above. The short answer is you can pan a monopod left and right by twisting it so your monopod head doesn't need to pan. While one could pan a tripod by picking it up and twisting it, that is suboptimal. That's why tripod heads can pan.

  • Although most tripods with a center column will let you rotate the center column independently of the head.
    – Michael C
    Jan 5, 2017 at 2:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.