4

I am trying to apply a Image sharpening 2D filter kernel(Laplacian) on a Image in my proprietary Image/Video processing pipeline(From Camera raw to final JPEG/MPEG). I plan to perform 2D convolution of this Laplacian kernel with the 2D image array to sharpen the image. My questions is :-

What is the most suitable colour space to apply this image sharpening filter to get best output image quality

a) Should I apply this filter on each component(R,G, & B) in the RGB space?

or

b)Should I apply this in the YUV space and only on Y component (or should it be also applied on U and V components)?

Any pointers will be useful.

thank you.

-AD.

Improve this question

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
6

It depends on how your sharpening kernel works, if it just enhances the contrast either side of a boundary like an unsharp mask filter then you want to use the YUV (or LAB) space but apply the filter on the luminance channel only.

The reason for this is that increasing the contrast of a colour boundary can result in odd looking colour shifts, i.e. in a pale red to pale blue boundary you could end up with yellowy-red line on one side immediately next to a strong blue line. Here's a somewhat extreme example (but using a real image. Can you guess the landmark?)

unsharpened image

all colour channels sharpened

just luminance sharpened

Also you rarely see fine colour detail in images that's worthy of sharpening. Bayer interpolation / image compression both smooth colour detail. Also the eye isn't very sensitive to missing colour detail anyway (which is why compression removes it).

So in summary sharpening all channels will be three times the amount of work, can introduce colour artifacts and if not it may make little difference as there is generally much less colour detail than luminance detail.

Improve this answer
7
  • When you mentioned about 'odd looking colour shifts', was it if one does filtering/sharpening in RGB space or UV space?
    – goldenmean
    Feb 9, 2011 at 17:11
  • @goldenmean: It makes little or no difference -- it happens either way.
    – Jerry Coffin
    Feb 9, 2011 at 18:21
  • It doesn't matter which space you use, but if you sharpen the luminance channel only you don't get colour artifacts.
    – Matt Grum
    Feb 9, 2011 at 18:33
  • 1
    +1 Nice analysis of the difference between luminance-only sharpening and all-channel sharpening. I'm seeing artifacts in the luminance-only sharpening, too (consider the left edge of the building where a line of pixels has been darkened; this did not happen in the all-channel sharpened image). It looks like one could decide to sharpen either way, depending on the purpose of the sharpening and the nature of the image.
    – whuber
    Feb 9, 2011 at 19:05
  • 1
    If your purpose of sharpening is only to correct for actual softness in the image (such as lens softness, anti-aliasing filter, or bayer interpolation), then it's quite legitimate to sharpen the colour channels too (though probably by a different amount than luminance). Only if you over-sharpen like in the above samples would you notice any undesirable colour shift. If the over-sharpening "effect" (local contrast enhancement) is your goal, however, then depending on what you want, you may even want the colour shift (or then again you might not). So there's no hard and fast rule.
    – thomasrutter
    Feb 10, 2011 at 4:22
3

That's a thoughtful and intriguing question. However, because the transformation between RGB and YUV is linear and the Laplacian (or any kernel convolution) is also linear, it does not matter in principle which basis you use. In practice there can be tiny differences due to the discretization of the values (which are usually represented as small binary integers).

If you apply the filter only on the Y component you will get some sharpening, akin to a pan-sharpened satellite image. But why stop there? You might as well sharpen the U and V channels too, unless you are looking for this somewhat subtle special effect (of sharp luminance but relatively blurry chrominance). Search Google Images on "pan-sharpened" or "pan-enhanced" to see examples of what these can look like.

Improve this answer

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.