2

I have recently started photography. I have completed web course in beginner photography, but I am completely hopeless in getting sharp photos. I have Nikon d5300 with 18-70mm lens. And I want to take sharp photos of flat lays where all objects are in focus. I know that I need to use small aperture in order to have all objects in focus and that I need to compensate it with longer shutter speed to let in more light since it is indoors, but I feel like I have used all possible combinations of ISO, shutter speed and aperture, but the objects are never sharp when photo is later zoomed to 100% on computer.

In order to make things better, I:

  • use tripod (Benro)
  • set shooting to 10 sec timer to make sure I don't shake the camera when I release the shutter
  • take photos in daylight, near a huge window
  • use DIY foil reflectors from 3 sides

One of the photos:

example image of objects on white background

The camera is 30 cm away from flowers. Flowers are the tallest object, approx 20 cm high. On the lens, autofocus is enabled. (the photo looks blue because I messed up with white balance, it seemed as the correct color on camera display, but it turned out to be blue on computer screen). I don't use zoom at all or go max 30mm

1.What can I do to improve sharpness? 2.What aperture would you recommend for the given scene? 3.On which object should I set focus?

Thank you,

|improve this question
  • Can you include details about the settings you're currently using (in your example)? How small is the aperture, how long is the shutter speed? – Harry Harrison Nov 6 '16 at 15:53
  • 1
    Possible duplicate of Why are my photos not crisp? – Philip Kendall Nov 6 '16 at 16:15
  • 1
    I think Harry Harrison's answer is probably the correct one, but as noted in answers to the question @Philip Kendall linked to, pixel peeping is probably also part of the problem. Note, too, that the laws of physics are against pixel peepers: the individual pixels in a 24 MP DX/APS-C sensor are small enough to diffract the light a bit, causing some blurring (complicated by Bayer filters and demosaicing). – j_foster Nov 6 '16 at 18:40
  • 1
    Also dupe : How can I improve the sharpness for tabletop still life of photography? – J... Nov 6 '16 at 20:16
  • Per the link above, your lens has peak corner-to-corner sharpness at around 24mm F/8. Looks like DOF is the problem in the photo you linked - the flowers stand taller above the table than everything else and fall out of the focal plane. Stopping down will give you more depth of field but, at a point (F/11+) you start losing sharpness due to diffraction. – J... Nov 6 '16 at 20:23
5

In addition to mattdm's suggestion to get a flash or two (which can be a very cheap way to get better light for your image).

The sharpness in the sample image looks reasonable for a kit lens - most of the objects are around the edges of the image - and the corners are likely to be the least sharp parts of a lens. The focal plane of a lens is not always flat - so focussing on the center of the image, may not give you sharp corners.

Lenses normally have a "sweet" aperture when they have their optimum sharpness - find out where this is for your lens. You may want to consider a prime lens which are generally sharper than zooms - as you have a specific setup - you can work out what focal length is required and buy a prime close to this.

Although the rest of the image isn't as sharp as possible (see above) - there is a specific reason why the flowers are out of focus. If the flowers are only 30cm from the lens, then this is too close for your lens. The minimum focus distance for the Nikon 18-70mm is 0.38m according to the Nikon website - your scene is simply too close to your camera

|improve this answer
3

Although the rest of the image isn't as sharp as possible (see other answer) - there is a specific reason why the flowers are out of focus. If the flowers are only 30cm from the lens, then this is too close for your lens. The minimum focus distance for the Nikon 18-70mm is 0.38m according to the Nikon website - your scene is simply too close to your camera

|improve this answer
  • yes, this is a good point. I somehow imagined that I read in the manual 30 cm not 38 cm. thanks! – Kots Nov 6 '16 at 16:17
  • MFD is measured to the point of focus. DoF extends in front of the point of focus and when the lens is focused at the MFD one half of the DoF will extend closer than the MFD. – Michael C Nov 7 '16 at 2:38
2

TL;DR: Open up to f/8 or f/11, move the camera further away to frame your subject at 40mm zoom.

I know that I need to use small aperture in order to have all objects in focus ...

Most lenses are sharpest somewhere in the middle of their aperture range (typically near f/5.6 - f/11, depending on the lens). While you didn't specify the aperture you're using, being as close as you are and needing some DoF, I assume you're shooting at f/16 or f/22. According to the performance tests at photozone.de, your lens will produce the sharpest results at f/8 or f/11.

But that will narrow your DoF considerably. Therefore, in conjunction with opening up to f/8 or f/11, you should move your camera further from your subject. Again, according to the same tests at photozone.de, your lens performs much better at 40mm than either 18mm or 70mm:

  • You will have virtually zero pincushion or barrel distortion at 40mm.
  • The lens vignettes least at 40mm f/8 or f/11.

Moving further away will have the additional benefit of reducing the perspective distortion of the items on the table. For instance, the lip balm container and the glass of milk won't be "leaning away" from each other nearly as much. The standing Eiffel Tower miniature won't look as much like a metal "X" with an off-center dot as it does.

(... unless the perspective distortion is something you were going for, in which case the above paragraph is not an additional benefit; it would be a tradeoff for achieving the best performance of your lens.)

|improve this answer
2

Sounds like it's time for you to take more control of the light. I recommend a low-cost manual flash like those from Godox or Yongnou. It's darker indoors than our intuition tells us, and brining more light is an easy and cost-effective fix. For your still life, you probably also want a soft box, although there are DIY modifiers you could use as well.

|improve this answer
  • might be worth suggesting bounce flash as well - as this could be a good cheap way of getting diffuse light levels higher. – Harry Harrison Nov 6 '16 at 16:04
  • I am afraid any artificial light won't look so good as daylight, so I want to try to take most of the camera settings, but not sure how to.. – Kots Nov 6 '16 at 16:20
  • 2
    @Kots Using artificial light takes a little more practice and skill, but you absolutely can make it look as good as daylight, and because you are in control, often much better. It's something to learn, but it's not rocket science, and I promise it will be worth it. – Please Read Profile Nov 6 '16 at 16:40
  • 1
    Flash has one more strength: due to its short duration, it can essentially eliminate the subject moving during the exposure. – Jerry Coffin Nov 6 '16 at 21:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.