0
\$\begingroup\$

Like explained in this question

Does focus breathing make a lens slower when close focusing?

focus breathing does change the effective F-stop. At the same time, the lens behaves, as if it was a shorter focal length.

Since both these factors affect DOF, how can one determine the overall effect on the DOF ?

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • \$\begingroup\$ I'm not sure I will ever understand the over-awareness about everything that could possibly somehow have an influence on depth of field. \$\endgroup\$
    – null
    Nov 5, 2016 at 18:44
  • \$\begingroup\$ Some people are just interested in the technical side of photography. Nothing to wonder about too much :) \$\endgroup\$ Nov 5, 2016 at 18:52
  • \$\begingroup\$ Other times, a question just bugs you, so why not ask it here, where others can potentially profit from it ? \$\endgroup\$ Nov 5, 2016 at 18:53
  • \$\begingroup\$ There's nothing wrong with your question or asking it here at all. =) I was just feeling like we get a lot of questions related to this. \$\endgroup\$
    – null
    Nov 5, 2016 at 19:14

1 Answer 1

1
\$\begingroup\$

As you close focus you are racking the lens further and further from film/senor. This now elongated distance is no longer called focal length; it is the back focus distance. The focal length is a measurement taken when the lens is imaging an object at infinity (as far as the eye can see).

As you close focus and approach a magnification factor of 1 (life-size often called unity or 1:1), the back focus distance increases one complete focal length. As an example, at unity, a 50mm lens will have a back focus distance of 100mm. The subject to film/sensor distance will be 4× the focal length.

At close focusing distances the depth of field is computed based on the back focus distance. Additionally a revised f-number is plugged into the equation.

At unity the back focus is 2× the focal length, and the f-number is 2 f-stops more stopped down. These revisions must be taken into account when computing depth of field.

Given the following definitions,

P = distance to object
Pd = distant point sharply defined
Pn = near point sharply defined
D = diameter of circle of confusion
f = f-number (revised when close focusing)
F = focal length (back focus when close focusing)

Then:

Pn = P ÷ (1 + P∙D∙f/F²)

Pd = P ÷ (1 - P∙D∙f/F²)

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ @iinkista – I did not intend to delete your edit. It improved my post tremendously. I was looking for a way to accept the edit and I hit the wrong keys. You efforts on my behalf much appreciated. \$\endgroup\$ Nov 6, 2016 at 1:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.