33

I am looking at pictures taken by some of the first satellites and landers there were like the Viking Lander on Mars in ~1976 Viking Lander on Mars in ~1976 or even the first image of the backside of the Moon in 1959 by Luna 3Backside of the Moon in 1959

I wonder how these photos were processed. Was it some very early digital cameras? Or did those craft have roll film onboard which was then developed on-site? Probably there are differences between 1959 and 1976.
Furthermore, how was this data then transferred to Earth? I assume the transmission itself was analog but was it already in some kind of (raw) file format?

  • This got me thinking too – Janardan S Oct 11 '16 at 11:07
  • 9
    Earth-orbit satellites in fact did drop film cannisters, which once in the lower atmosphere deployed parachutes and were captured mid-air with specialized aircraft. This didn't work from Mars :-) . All the same, you might have spent a minute or two at nasa.gov to get the answers. – Carl Witthoft Oct 11 '16 at 11:21
  • 3
    @CarlWitthoft: petapixel.com/2014/08/31/… has a video of such a capture – Max Oct 11 '16 at 20:00
  • 1
    That ain't no moon... – Lightness Races in Orbit Oct 12 '16 at 10:19
  • 5
    It sounds impressive to transmit pictures a long way, before the invention of digital cameras and the internet. But we'd been doing it since the 1930s and calling it "television". – David Richerby Oct 13 '16 at 8:10
24

Luna 3 did something as complicated as you thought: It took photos on a film, processed it in a kind of onboard minilab, and then scanned and radioed it back home in analog way not unlike an old fax.

Funniest part was that Soviets didn't have the technology of radiation-hardened film, but Americans did. They used it against Soviets in high-altitude spy balloons. This program was quite a failure for Americans, but Soviets retrieved some of those balloons before they spent their precious cargo and repurposed the film for a space mission. Manufactured in the USA, sent to the Moon by Soviet Russia! You can read more about Luna 3 here

If you ask about similarities to raw "format", analog picture transmission is more like uncompressed bitmap than raw dump from a typical modern sensor. Raw data is not a format, every sensor makes it's own and there are no metadata like end-of-line markers or info about what sensel represents which color. Analog transmission (as in fax or TV) usually is way more structured, eg time to return the scanning beam to the beginning of the next line makes a natural end-of-line marker, or a special tone is used to denote that, which among others allows at least partial recovery of the image if there are some hiccups.

19

Amongst the myriad online pages documenting the Viking series, here's one which states clearly

The Viking Lander camera design was very different from vidicon framing or CCD array cameras. The lander camera was a facsimile camera with a single, stationary photosensor array (PSA), and azimuth and elevation scanning mechanisms. A lander image was generated by scanning the scene in two directions (elevation and azimuth) to focus light onto the photosensor array. The Viking Lander cameras were built by Itek Corp. A number of published papers described the characteristics and performance of the lander cameras. The scientific rationale and early design of the cameras were described in Mutch et al. [1972] and a detailed description of the flight cameras was given in Huck et al. [1975b]. Huck and Wall [1976] discussed image quality and Patterson et al. [1977] described camera performance during the Primary Mission. A summary of the information from these papers is given here as a high-level description of the camera and its operating modes.

There's a ton of autobiographical material at ITEK sites and sites maintained by former employees of ITEK.

  • 23
    The link in fact explains that the data was transmitted and stored in a digital form from the very start. So the answer to the OP's question, which you left out, is: yes, it was a digital camera (although one operating based on a different principle) and the data was transmitted in digital form. – Szabolcs Oct 11 '16 at 14:54
  • @Szabolcs: I wonder how the storage density for six-bit digital (using technology of the day) compared with the storage density of a modulated analog signal? – supercat Oct 11 '16 at 15:01
  • 4
    @supercat But any digital data is transmitted by modulating an analog signal ... there's no digital in nature. Well, maybe states of spin-1/2 particles can be considered digital but then we're entering the realm of quantum mechanics and have qubits instead of bits :-) – Szabolcs Oct 11 '16 at 15:03
  • 1
    @Szabolcs: My question was more about how the storage density that could be achieved via deterministic quantizing to 6 bits prior to storage (perhaps storing the bits on separate tracks on the tape) compared with the density of keeping the signal as analog except for non-determinisitic quantizing caused by things like discrete tape particles). – supercat Oct 11 '16 at 15:17
  • 1
    @Sebastian I didn't phrase it well. What I meant was that based on my skim of the article Carl linked to, the signal was digitized within the Viking Lander camera itself. I did not mean to refer to other missions or cameras. – Szabolcs Oct 11 '16 at 18:27
4

I am not sure this is necessarily a question about what space craft used specifically, but rather what electronic solutions existed for capturing and processing images before the ubiquity of digital cameras.

Well, in addition to the solutions in the other answers I would like to mention the Video Camera Tube (the Vidicon briefly mentioned in the quote in Carl's answer is an example). This is a camera that works in the same way as your old CRT television, but in reverse.

Light is focused onto a photosensitive plate placed in front of the cathode ray tube. Charge builds up as photons hit the plate, and as the electron beam scans the plate from behind, the interaction between the electrons in the scanning beam and the charge on the plate at each point generates a varying potential difference on the plate, and it is this that becomes your analog image signal. You could then process this using analog image processing techniques, and then modulate the signal before transmission back to earth.

3

The Earth observation satellites used the two above mentionned method. In 1956, the USA launched the Corona program which used special 70 millimeter film with 610 mm focal length camera (according to wikipedia). Film was then retrieved from orbit with a reentry capsule.

In 1964, the first Nimbus satellite carried different sensors capable of taking pictures and sending those picture to ground stations using the ATP system (an analog system).

The first Earth Observation satellite equipped with a CCD sensor was the KH-11 (a spy satellite from USA) back in 1976.

0

There's a great video that explains how NASA's lunar orbiters worked here, and generally lots of information at moonviews.com, which also tells the story of how the magnetic tapes that stored the received data were found and reprocessed. It's a great story.

The short answer to your question is that the orbiters took photos on analog film, processed them automatically in a dry Polaroid-like development system, and then scanned the images and sent them back to Earth.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.