I currently own a Tamron 17-55 f/2.8 lens which I love. It is not labeled as a wide angle lens. Is it beneficial to purchase a lens explicitly labeled as a wide angle lens (like the Rokinon 16mm f/2.0)? Will it really offer me anything different than the Tamron can (besides the extra stop)?


You are asking two questions:

  1. Is the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 a wide angle lens?
  2. Does a specific wide angle lens have a benefit over the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8?

I have two answers:

  1. The Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 lens is a zoom lens and covers the range of a wide angle lens as well as a normal lens and depending on the definition you have, can also be considered a short telephoto lens.
  2. As you already noted, the lens you suggested does offer more light gathering abilities but the fact that it is designated and marketed as a wide angle lens does not itself give you any additional benefit. If if was a Brand X 17mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Lens, there is no reason to believe that it will provide any different images than your Tamron that is not sold as simply a wide angle lens.

For more information I would recommend this question: If a lens supports 18mm focal length, is that a wide angle lens?

| improve this answer | |

The Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 Di II is an APS-C only lens. That means it projects an image circle large enough for APS-C sensors that are roughly 24 x 16mm (Nikon. Petax) or just a tad smaller in the case of Canon. On a Canon APS-C camera it should provide a diagonal angle of view of around 78.5º

The Rokinon/Samyang/Bower/(whatever else it is being labeled as this week) 16mm f/2 ED AS is also an APS-C only lens. It offers a slightly wider diagonal angle of view at 79.5º.

In contrast, a 17mm lens with an image circle large enough to cover a 35mm film sized "full frame" sized sensor provides an angle of view of around 105º when used with a FF camera. During the film era an angle of view greater than about 85-90º was considered "wide angle." By this standard neither a 16mm nor 17mm lens provides a "wide angle" field of view when used on a APS-C camera.

That one is labeled as a wide angle lens by its marketers while the other is not has absolutely no effect on the angles of view provided by each lens. It's more a reflection of the time period when each was introduced. They're both rectilinear lenses and also present roughly the same projections of a 3-dimensional world onto a 2-dimensional imaging sensor.

At the time the Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II was introduced in 2006 almost all digital SLR cameras had APS-C sized sensors. Nikon, Pentax, and Sony had yet to even offer a single digital SLR model with a full frame 35mm film sized sensor. In that environment, a 17-50mm digital lens (i.e. one for APS-C digital cameras) was not really considered wide angle since the field of view using such a lens on an APS-C camera is similar to using a 26-75mm lens or 28-80mm lens on a traditional 35mm film camera. The 28-70mm or 28-80mm zoom used with 35mm film has traditionally been referred to as a medium zoom.

Only with the emergence of many full frame camera models beyond a very few top pro bodies has the use of wide angle once again been used to describe lenses in the 16-18mm focal length range intended for use on digital cameras (which no longer assumes an APS-C imaging sensor format). Apparently this is even the case with some recently introduced APS-C only lenses in the 16-18mm range at their widest angle of view.

| improve this answer | |

Whether a lens is explicitly marked as a wide-angle lens or not is kind of irrelevant. What is important in terms of 'angle of view' is the focal length (or focal range in the case of a zoom lens).

Comparing your 17-55mm lens with a 16mm lens, the 16mm lens has a focal length 1mm shorter than your zoom (at its widest). Technically, a focal length 1mm shorter will produce a wider angle of view, but a difference of just 1mm is too small to bring any meaningful benefit.

Take a look at this page for a graphical representation:

| improve this answer | |

17mm is definitely wide angle, regardless of whether it is marketed as a wide angle lens or not. 16mm will give you just slightly a wider angle than you can get at 17mm.

| improve this answer | |
  • For short focal, every mm counts. With a D70, 17mm yields a horizontal FoV of 69.5° compared to 73.4° at 16mm : a difference of about 4°. This difference is only about 1° between 35 and 36mm. – Olivier Sep 28 '16 at 17:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.