Do all Canon DSLRs have autofocus motors? I've searched a lot but found mixed answers. Some sites say that no EOS body has a focus motor (and that all EF lenses have AF motors), but some say all EOS bodies have AF motors. Which is correct?

  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ @Janas That blog post is full of spelling errors and nonsensical words (machine translation?). I would be highly skeptical of any claims made in that piece of writing. \$\endgroup\$
    – Nayuki
    Commented Aug 16, 2016 at 19:01

3 Answers 3


No Canon EOS body needs AF motors because every single Canon EF lens released since the EOS system was introduced since 1987 has a focus motor in the lens. Thus no Canon EOS camera has ever had a need for a focus motor in the body.

There are a few manual focus lenses in the EOS system, but they are clearly designated as such by not being named as an EF lens: The MP-E 65mm 1-5X Macro lens is one such example. The TS-E series of tilt & shift lenses are another. Beyond those few rare lenses every EOS lens has AF capability built into the lens. The vast majority of those lenses have Ring type UltraSonic Motors driving the focus mechanisms of those lenses. A few lenses have newer STM motors which are more suited for use capturing video. A few others use micro-USM motors and a few others use plain old geared motors to drive the AF system. But all of them have the AF motor located inside the lens.

Not only do Canon EOS bodies not need a clunky, noisy mechanical interface between the body and lens for autofocus, but they don't need a mechanical linkage prone to adjustment issues left over from the 1950s to control the lens' aperture either. This means that all communication between a Canon EOS body and a Canon EOS lens is communicated electronically.

  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ Re. the last paragraph: Unnecessary rant, doesn't do anything toward answering the question, takes a cheap shot and fails to point out that anyone using the EF mount is stuck shooting Canon. \$\endgroup\$
    – Blrfl
    Commented Aug 17, 2016 at 11:13
  • \$\begingroup\$ The criticism of mechanical linkages between the camera body and lenses is a valid one, as they do introduce issues regarding performance, reliability, and usability that are not applicable to all electronic connections. Canon is not the only system to completely abandon such mechanical connections, they were just the first. All Micro Four-Thirds cameras and lenses also have only electronic connections between camera and lens. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Commented Aug 17, 2016 at 20:48
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ With regard to "...stuck shooting Canon." You pay your money and you make your choice. All camera systems currently on the market have their unique sets of advantages and disadvantages. One should choose the system that overall works best for them, or one should choose to use different systems for the different tasks for which each is best suited. To cry because someone else validly criticized an aspect of a system you might use comes across as petty defensive fanboyism. To bring up rep only sounds like sour grapes. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Commented Aug 17, 2016 at 21:00
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ And no one missed the snark in your first comment above, we just chose to be an adult and not reply with an equally childish response.. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Commented Aug 17, 2016 at 21:12
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I wasn't reading your other answers; I was reading this one. You'll get no argument from most corners, mine included, that both systems have their deficiencies. Your criticism is absolutely valid, but its addition here reeks of the same fanyboyism of which you accuse me and, frankly, spoils an otherwise fine answer from someone I thought was above that. \$\endgroup\$
    – Blrfl
    Commented Aug 17, 2016 at 23:03

No Canon EOS camera has an in-body focus motor. Canon's lens mount is 100% electric, there is no mechanical linkage. (Some mounts e.g. Pentax have a mechanical link for the aperture too, for some lenses).

The EF designation of Canon's lenses stands for Electro-Focus - in other words, the focus is driven electronically. Each lens has a built in motor.

There are some exceptions, most notably the MP-E and TS-E lenses are manual focus only. However, the aperture control is still electronic, hence the "E" in the name.


No. All Canon EF lenses have in-lens motors. There is no need for an in-body AF motor.

The Canon EF mount is designed to have no mechanical coupling of any kind—no aperture levers, "screw-drive" AF couplers, or any other mechanical linkage between the lens and body. It is entirely electronic; all EF lenses have autofocus motors and electromagnetic diaphragms built in.

Note that there a few EF-mount lenses (the tilt-shift lenses and a 5X super-macro lens) that are manual focus. Although they are electronically controlled nonetheless, the lenses themselves are not designated EF because they are not autofocus. The tilt-shift lenses are designated TS-E; the 5X super-macro lens is designated MP-E (macro photo).

Some fun facts about the EF mount and Canon EOS: The EF mount is, in fact, the first entirely electronic mount, having been introduced in 1987. Hence, Canon has the honor of having the world's first fully electronic camera system. So how do other systems stack up?

  • Until very recently, all Nikon lenses had a mechanical aperture lever controlled by the camera body. Only those lenses designated with the letter E after the aperture specification have an electromagnetic diaphragm, and many lenses (primarily older designs) still rely on an in-body AF motor for autofocus.
  • The same can be said for Pentax; electromagnetic diaphragms and the corresponding KAF4 mount specification weren't introduced until June 2016 with the Pentax DA 55-300mm f/4.5-6.3 PLM lens. A large number of lenses, both old and new (though mostly cheaper ones) rely on the in-body AF motor for autofocus.
  • As far as I know, Sony continues to rely on mechanical aperture control in the A system, and older lenses still use the in-body AF motor. The E mount, however, is entirely electronic.
  • The Four Thirds SLR system and all major mirrorless systems, except for the Leica M rangefinder system, have fully electronic mounts, but they weren't introduced until well into the 2000s.
  • \$\begingroup\$ Nikon still sells new lenses that rely on in-body AF motors, as most of their bodies (apart from the low end models) still support it. For example, all the lenses listed here that say "AF" but not "AF-S" (with or without "D" at the end) require body motors. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 17, 2016 at 1:12
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ "Older" means older designs; many of these older designs are still in production. Most new designs have built-in motors. \$\endgroup\$
    – bwDraco
    Commented Aug 17, 2016 at 1:13
  • \$\begingroup\$ @thomasrutter That really depends on how one defines "most of their bodies." In terms of sales numbers the D3xxx and D5xxx series without in-body AF motors greatly exceed all of the higher models with in-body AF motors. There's a greater variety of models with in-body AF (D7xxx, D5xx. D7xx, Dx), but the number of total bodies produced without it is greater than those with it. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    Commented Mar 1, 2017 at 18:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.