Why do videographers have rectangular lens hoods available? Do they only use internally-focusing lenses? Lastly, why don't DSLRs use rectangular hoods?


2 Answers 2


Why do videographers have rectangular lens hoods available?

Primarily because videographers frequently mount rectangular filters such as NDs and ND grads, and for the ability to use flags or barn doors to more finely control light blocking.

Light control is more important in videography than in photography, because one exposure control variable, shutter speed, is not a free variable under the videographer's control (they are limited by the frame rate for the video). The adjustable barn doors / flags correspond to the image's aspect ratio crop. Of course, straight-edged barn doors that correspond to the rectangular aspect ratio allow for tight light control, as well as being easy and inexpensive to manufacture. Rounded or curved barn doors with adjustable cone shapes are a lot more complicated and expensive to make, and are not useful because they don't match the aspect ratio crop.

Adjustable barn doors are not as useful in photography. The photographer's position is typically more fluid / transient, and even when it's not, shading and flagging needs are usually only for a few shots, and can be easily controlled by an intern with gobos or block cards, or stands with clamps to hold the gobos.

Do they only use Internally-focusing lenses?

Pretty much, yes. But not necessarily exclusively. All of the cine lenses I've seen are internally-focusing (but my experience with cine lenses is rather limited). Non-IF lenses are undesirable in videography because everything in front of the lens (matte box, filters, etc.) have to move in conjunction with focus changes. And because of the weight of matte boxes and filters, they aren't mounted onto the lens; they are mounted on the video accessory rails in front of the lens.

Lastly, why don't DSLRs use rectangular hoods?

Most photographic lens hoods are round (or tulip shaped) for compactness. A round lens nestled in a round hood in a round or round-ish lens pocket or camera bag compartment allows us to be more space-efficient with our gear.

Note that some photographic lens hoods are rectangular. While not DSLRs, many hoods for rangefinder camera lenses are rectangular. As WayneF notes in his answer, the tulip-shaped hoods on many DSLR lenses are the approximate intersection line between the projected rectangular field of view and a cylinder or cone.

In the context of slide-in square or rectangular filters, rectangular hoods are not very convenient in photography. Videographers never have to worry about orientation: their video is always presented in landscape orientation1. Photographers frequently change between landscape and portrait orientation. For shooters who use them, directionally-oriented filters (such as polarizers and ND grads) need to be large enough to be usable for either orientation. Note that ND grads and polarizers must maintain the same position/orientation with respect to the scene, regardless of camera orientation. As I mentioned, that isn't a concern in videography (for the most part). But in photographic uses, that requirement of orientation-independence strongly implies rotational symmetry, i.e., circles. That doesn't require filters to be circular; rather, it implies that if a filter covers a certain circular area, it is guaranteed to cover the lens's entire image circle, regardless of camera orientation. This is one of the reasons you don't typically see hoods mounted in front of square/rectangular filter holders on photographic cameras. But you often see matte box filter holders with barn door, bellows, or other rectangular hoods in front of them.

For photographers who do need or want rectangular hoods or matte boxes, they are available. Those users are just a relatively small portion of the DLSR-wielding population.

1 : I'm not talking about people who take vertical videos with their smartphones.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Mostly good answer, but the rotational symmetry part assumes that you can attach the hood any direction you like onto the lens. Some lens hoods — particularly the generic ones that attach to the filter threads — do allow that, but lens hoods purpose-made for a specific lens generally click into the proper orientation. Thus, as the lens rotates around its axis, so does the hood. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 14, 2016 at 23:19
  • \$\begingroup\$ @WarrenYoung that part I was actually referring to filters, and rectangular filter holders. Photographers need their ND grad filters & polarizers to work in any camera orientation, so they tend not to be used in the context of a matte box with a built-in aspect ratio. My point there was that rectangular matte boxes like used in video don't work as well in photography. But you are right, and after rereading, I can see that my point wasn't very clear. \$\endgroup\$
    – scottbb
    Commented Aug 14, 2016 at 23:29
  • \$\begingroup\$ In videography shutter speed is in effect a free variable via shutter angle. But the shot may constrain the variable to ensure a specific look, necessitating external light control. \$\endgroup\$
    – 52d6c6af
    Commented Sep 5, 2018 at 5:23

The tulip shaped hoods are a rectangular field... http://www.google.com/search?q=tulip+lens+hood

  • \$\begingroup\$ Yes. To clarify, for anyone too lazy to click through the link, the odd shape we call "tulip" with lens hoods comes from taking a circular lens hood and projecting the imaging area's rectangle through it, clipping away the parts that the sensor simply can't see. Then the shape is rounded off a bit from there. Thus, a tulip lens hood effectively adapts a round shape (the end of the lens) to a rectangular shape (the rectangular pyramid of the imaging area projected through the hood' space). \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 14, 2016 at 23:21
  • \$\begingroup\$ Specifically, the Lens hood article at toothwalker.org has good illustrations of the various lens hoods (at the bottom of the article). I wish they were CC-BY-SA licensed, those are excellent illustrations. \$\endgroup\$
    – scottbb
    Commented Aug 14, 2016 at 23:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.