Using 85mm as an example, how can I get the same "85mm look" (shot on a FX camera with an 85mm FX lens) on a DX camera with the same 85mm FX lens??

I know a 58mm FX lens (87mm DX equiv), shot from the exact same distance with a DX camera, will look almost identical and yield a very close perspective background.

But is the only other way to get the same "85mm look" on a DX camera, with an 85mm FX lens, to simply move backwards?

Will this simple technique give me the same non-cropped image a FX camera would have produced with the 85mm FX lens?

I understand that from the same distance the DX camera will produce a larger image like a 127mm. If I simply move back a few feet will my photo look like a perfect 85mm photo an FX camera would have produced with the FX lens at the shorter distance?

I know the bokeh, perspective and composition will be slightly different but do you essentially get the exact same "mm look" with a FX lens on a DX body by simply moving back a few feet?

Of course, with a wide-angle lens, other things are going on but for basically a full body shot of a person does simply moving back a few feet turn a 85mm FX lens into a perfect 85mm lens for a DX camera? Or do you lose that "85mm look" by putting more distance between you and the subject?


2 Answers 2


No. You can only get the same look by standing in the same place. Otherwise, perspective will be altered. Nothing you can do with the lens (or camera) can get around that.

On a DX format camera, to get an "85mm look" — the look of an 85mm lens on a "full frame" 35mm-format camera, or FX in Nikon terms — you need a lens that's 1.5× shorter to match field of view, and also approximately with an aperture 1.5× faster to get the same approximate depth of field.

You can also use the "Brenizer method" of panoramic stitching to simulate a wider and faster lens than you have, but you'll still have to stand in the same place to get the same look.


I know a 58mm FX lens (87mm DX equiv), shot from the exact same distance with a DX camera, will look almost identical and yield a very close perspective background.


But is the only other way to get the same "85mm look" on a DX camera, with an 85mm FX lens, to simply move backwards?

Nope. This will give you something like a "135mm look" (give or take), because that's what you'd use on FX to get the same framing from that spot.

Take a look at some of the graphics in the answers to What does it really mean that telephoto lenses "flatten" scenes? — I think they'll really help.

  • \$\begingroup\$ @inkista Aren't Brenizer-method photos just creating shallower depth of field, and usually shot with a tripod at one place? What am I missing? \$\endgroup\$
    – mattdm
    Jul 10, 2016 at 17:07
  • \$\begingroup\$ It's essentially using the same focal length from the same working distance, and "filling in the borders" of the larger format by shooting additional frames and panostitching. It's how full-frame shooters fake the medium format look; so by extension, an APS-C shooter can use it to fake the full frame look. Same thin DoF, but with a wider FoV. \$\endgroup\$
    – inkista
    Jul 10, 2016 at 17:25
  • \$\begingroup\$ It will let you simulate the depth of field of a wider aperture — but it still can't change perspective. That's the crux of the question. Even with that approach, you need to be in the same place to get the same perspective. \$\endgroup\$
    – mattdm
    Jul 10, 2016 at 17:30
  • \$\begingroup\$ You are in the same place. Hence the same perspective. Same distance. Same focal length. \$\endgroup\$
    – inkista
    Jul 10, 2016 at 17:57
  • \$\begingroup\$ Errrr, yes? What are you koffing about, then? \$\endgroup\$
    – mattdm
    Jul 10, 2016 at 17:59

“Correct” perspective is not critical for most images. Portraiture is an exception. Things close to the camera reproduce large and things far from the camera reproduce small. If the camera is worked in too close, the nose reproduces too large and the ears too small. This is the dreaded facial distortion that makes portraits look weird.

Factorial: An image will display correct perspective if viewed from a distance about equal to the focal length multiplied by the magnification used to make the displayed image.

Say we make a portrait imaged with our FX camera. The frame size is 24mm X 36mm. This is a miniature image that must be enlarged to be viewed and scrutinized. We make an 8 X 12 inch image and display it. To make the 8 X 12 we were required to magnify (enlarge), the FX frame 8.5X.

We mount an 85mm. lens to do this task. The viewing distance for correct perspective becomes 85mm X 8.5 (magnification) = 723mm (28 inches). In other words, a portrait taken using an FX camera with an 85mm lens is enlarged to make an 8 X 12 inch print is suitable for viewing and the viewing distance becomes 723mm (28.4 inches). This image presents “correct” perspective.

Now we mount the 85mm on an FX. The frame size is 16mm X 24mm. To make the same 8 x 12 inch print we must enlarge this miniature frame 12.7 X. This magnification is 1.5 X greater than used to make the same image with the DX camera. With this lash-up the viewing distance becomes 85mm X 12.7 (magnification) = 1080mm (42 ½ inches). If this image is viewed from about 42 inches, the image displays correct perspective.

If we choose to view the 8 X 12 image made with the FX from 28 inches, the same as the image made using the DX, we must mount a shorter lens to achieve “correct” perspective.

The math is 85 ÷ 1.5 = 60mm (rounded). We mount a 60mm and make the portrait. The displayed print is viewed from 60mmn x 12.7 (magnification) = 762mm (30 inches).

Bottom line, when we a mount an 85mm on the FX and a 60mm on the DX, we can make a displayed images that when viewed from the same distance (about 30 inches) display similar perspective.


We choose the subject to camera distance to obtain a desired linear perspective. In portraiture correct linear perspective is the major contributor when it comes to pleasing the client. Fist we select the camera position then we select the focal length. Subject distance defines the perspective. Next we select a focal length. Focal length defines the how the principle subject is positioned within the frame. Short focal lengths reduce the size of the principle subject at the price of including more of the surroundings. Longer focal lengths enlarge the principle subject thus excluding the surroundings.

Linear perspective is a function of camera to subject distance. The liner perspective remains the same regardless of focal length or format size. The answer is: If the camera position is not changed, the perspective perceived is the same regardless of focal length or camera format.

  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ This doesn't answer the OP's question. The OP asked if they could get a 85mm (w.r.t. full frame) "look" by mounting 85mm on a crop body, perhaps by zooming with their feet. \$\endgroup\$
    – scottbb
    Jul 10, 2016 at 2:23
  • \$\begingroup\$ @ scottbb We position the camera to avoid facial distortion. This is simply a subject distance issue. Next we choose a focal length to compose with not too much and not too little background. All this is actually a matter of taste as there is no rule in art. Professionals who wish to please clients should attempt to reproduce the view the subject sees in a dressing mirror. As a rule of thumb this is accomplished choosing a lens that is 2 ½ times the diagonal measure of the frame. For the FX = about 105mm. For the DX = about 75mm. Nothing here is engraved in stone! \$\endgroup\$ Jul 12, 2016 at 19:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.