8
\$\begingroup\$

I am an amateur photographer and I have a newborn session coming up for a family friend.

My current gear is:

  • Canon T5i (crop sensor)
  • Canon 18-55 IS STM Kit lens
  • 85mm f/1.8 lens

I plan on buying a reflector for the shoot and will be using natural light as my light source.

So my question is: is this enough gear to get some nice photos? Should I get another prime lens besides the 85mm? I don't really use the kit lens.

I also have another 8 month old baby shoot coming up and an informal wedding shoot coming up so it would be nice to use the lenses in all situations. I don't need a telephoto at the moment and will probably not use one any time soon.

\$\endgroup\$

1 Answer 1

11
\$\begingroup\$

Focal lengths

I prefer using lenses in the Normal range of 35-50mm (35mm film equivalent) for newborn sessions as I shoot most of them on site and often in cramped settings. I queried the past year of newborn shoots and had the following distribution of lenses to images on a full frame camera:

Newborn lenses

It's worth noting that for portraits many people will stay clear away from focal lengths this wide. I agree for weddings and similar situations that anything wider than about 50mm should be avoided in most situations. Out of necessity due to most on site shooting locations I've found that 35mm often works very well for me. Also, newborns are quite forgiving!

On an APS-C sensor I would be completely comfortable shooting an entire newborn session with either a 24mm or a 35mm lens. On a full frame sensor I would feel the same way with either a 50mm or a 85mm lens.

Recently I personally have moved away from 85mm lenses as I just want to carry around less gear but the 85mm f/1.8 is a great option for newborn photography especially on a full frame sensor. If you know you will have more room, a 85mm on an APS-C sensor will certainly get most of the shots for a newborn session. I have used a 135mm lens on more than one occasion when I have the room and want the look a longer length can provide. But the vast majority of the time I don't have room for that focal length especially if I were using a crop sensor.

Beyond the most standard angles, macro shots are often nice to emphasize the small nature of babies. This may not be something you buy right away but you could look into cheaper alternatives such as extension tubes (although I find them quite difficult to use with a newborn).

An additional consideration would be if you want any overhead shots. If you want to capture from above the subject you either will need a wider focal length than 85mm or a tall stool to stand on(be careful!). An example of an overhead shot that is much easier with a 35mm(35mm eqiv) focal length:

example overhead

Other Considerations

You have a pretty limited kit, but in most cases you don't need a ton to do a good job with newborn photography.

Typically I would recommend having 2-3 off camera flashes in case the room has few natural lighting options. It also can just help you control the scene instead of leaving it up to the clients home and the weather conditions that day.

Other equipment you may want to strongly consider would be props. Items like wraps to me are critical, and other gender specific items can be nice as not all clients will have options provided. Beyond clothing; backdrops, flooring, baskets, etc. can all be very useful and add a lot to the image. It really comes down to what type of images you are trying to create. I personally try to strike a balance between elegant/simplified imagery and over the top setups which can require a lot of unique pieces.

Finally, although your question is equipment based I feel the need to bring up the most important concern of newborn photography and that is safety. I won't get into all of the details but since you are new to this you really need to look further into it. At a minimum always keep the babies safety at the top of your mind and don't try to recreate an image that may put the infant in any danger.

Summary

Must Haves

  • A normal focal length lens between 35-50mm (35mm film equiv) with an aperture of f/2 or greater
  • A large diffused light source
  • Outfits, blankets, backgrounds, wraps, props, etc.

Nice To Have

  • Beginner set of 2-3 off-camera light sources with softboxes or umbrellas
  • Portable backdrop system and backdrops
  • Portable heater
  • Macro lens
  • Neutral density filter (to allow for wider apertures and flash)

Make sure to check out the tag at this site for lots more info on this topic.

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you. This is exactly what I needed in terms of advice on the gear. You rock! My wife will be doing most of the handling of the baby. She has over 5 years of experience working with babies (its her trade). What would be a 35mm equivalent on a crop sensor. Is that closer to a 24mm? Again I really appreciate your feedback. \$\endgroup\$ May 27, 2016 at 19:04
  • \$\begingroup\$ 35mm/1.6X crop factor = 22mm. Since lens focal lengths are often rounded to the nearest "standard" focal length, a 24mm lens on a crop body is considered equivalent to a 35mm lens on a FF. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    May 28, 2016 at 0:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ I like what you say in your answer, but wish there were more regarding how lighting is what makes the real difference. Of course, with only the kit lens (not fast enough) and the 85mm f/1.8 (probably not wide enough), there is a hole in the lens lineup of the OP. But for less than the price of the 85mm f/1.8 a couple of cheap manual flashes, wireless triggers, and basic modifiers can be thrown into the mix. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    May 28, 2016 at 1:02
  • \$\begingroup\$ Understood. I do think it might be helpful to qualify that "2-3 off camera light sources with softboxes or umbrellas" doesn't necessarily mean laying out a couple of grand to meet that capability. Especially since the OP also includes the use case of older infants and informal weddings in the question. I might be overly influenced by my own experience. I avoided flash for way too long thinking it took a lot of money to get quality light. When I finally broke down and got a few cheap flashes I was amazed to discover how good the light from cheap flashes could make my photos look. \$\endgroup\$
    – Michael C
    May 28, 2016 at 1:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.