0

I am looking to buy my first macro lens and I am between two: SIGMA 70-300 mm f/4-5.6 DG or Tamron 70-300mm F4/5.6 DI LD Macro (Nikon AF). Which one is better ?

  • 1
    Are you actually looking for a macro lens, or a telephoto lens? – Dan Wolfgang May 13 '16 at 14:07
  • @DanWolfgang well, actually I am looking for a "budget" lens to take nice pics of the moon. However I wouldn't like to spend money on a lens that will only allow me to do that. The answer to your question is probably something in between?! – user3755632 May 13 '16 at 15:00
  • 2
    Taking pictures of the moon is very different from macro photography. How important is it to you to be able to get good closeup shots? – Era May 13 '16 at 16:28
  • @Era I am not very interested in macro in general.. I just like the moon. However I think it is a waste to spend £100+ to get lenses only for this purpose?! – user3755632 May 13 '16 at 20:59
  • It sounds like what you're looking for is a telephoto zoom lens (which the lenses you named are). I think the mention of macro threw off the question. – Era May 14 '16 at 2:40
6

Neither of those lenses are really what most macro specialists would consider a macro lens. For a lens to be considered a true macro lens it should be able to project a life sized image of the subject onto the image sensor or film. If you're taking a picture of a 20mm long bug, a macro lens should be able to focus close enough to project an image of the bug that is 20mm long. This referred to as a 1:1 reproduction ratio or 1.0X Maximum Magnification (MM). There are a few groups who define anything with an MM of more than 0.5 to be a macro lens, especially if that lens is designed to be used with a camera that has a smaller sensor or uses a film format smaller than the standard 36x24mm full frame/135 film format.

The Sigma has an MM of 1:4 or 0.25X.
The most recently introduced Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 (A005) has an MM of 1:3.9 or 0.26X. It's more expensive but also gives better image quality.
The older model (A17) listed in the question has an MM of 1:2 or 0.5X

So in terms of macro capability there's little difference at all between the two currently manufactured lenses. Neither really comes close to being a real macro lens. The older A17 it does have a better reproduction ratio, but is is still short of what many consider to be a true macro lens.

In terms of other optical performance there's also not a lot of difference between the two. They are very similar in their optical design and very similar in their performance.

Perhaps the biggest difference between the two is in ergonomics. Tamron lenses tend to zoom and focus by turning the rings the "wrong way" like Nikon lenses do. (I'm kidding. Sort of.) As viewed from the camera you turn the focus ring counterclockwise to focus on near objects and clockwise to focus on far objects. You turn the zoom ring counterclockwise to zoom to a wider focal length and clockwise to zoom to a longer focal length. Sigma lenses tend to zoom and focus by turning the rings in the opposite and "correct" direction like Canon lenses do.

  • Don't know about the Sigma, but the Tamron has a switch on the barrel that gets you to 1:2 or 0.5X at 300mm. I've used it for years on my Pentax to get small butterflies. – Mark Ransom Mar 12 '18 at 19:27
  • @MarkRansom It depends on exactly which specific lens model you're looking at. The stats in the answer are for the current 70-300mm f/4-5.6 model Tamron A005. Your lens appears to be the discontinued A17 version. – Michael C Mar 13 '18 at 0:14
  • Part of the confusion may stem from the fact that the DPReview article for the A17 uses the model number of the A005 at the top of each page. – Michael C Mar 13 '18 at 0:32
  • I just went to B&H and did a search on a copy/paste of the lens model in the question, and the only lens that came up is the one I described. Just did it again to be sure. – Mark Ransom Mar 13 '18 at 3:08
  • Which is why I took the 'discontinued' part out of the answer. They currently sell both the A17 and the A005. bhphotovideo.com/c/product/728343-REG/… – Michael C Mar 13 '18 at 4:24
0

the Sigma 70-300 is my opinion is: 1. loud during auto focus 2. often cannot find focal point 3. if you carry your camera in a side sling as I do gravity will extend it out to 300mm it does not stay where you left it. That said this lens works best outdoors I have great fun at the zoo with it. You can gets some almost Macro shots but it is a challenge to come out of Macro mode it is not just a flick of the switch. Also, if you are trying not to spook wildlife it is not the lens for you. The Tamron is quieter and if you must have this size lens it is the better option in my opinion.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.