2

A couple days ago, I zoomed in with my 30x optical zoom camera, and after some exposure adjustments, a bright star in the night sky turned into this:Bright star with (planets)?

Are those other planets or other stars? Or is that a lens effect? More info: The bright object in question was ~60 degrees above the horizon, and ESE of me (East-south-east). I took the picture on 3-25-16 from Madison, Wisconsin at 9 pm local time (CST)

  • 4
    Cross-posted to Astronomy and Photography. Please don't do that. It's against site policy because it fragments answers and wastes people's time when they write an answer to something that's already been answered elsewhere. – David Richerby Mar 27 '16 at 17:53
  • Giving the position in the sky and the date isn't very useful without also providing the time the image was captured (including what time standard the time is expressed in). – Michael C Mar 27 '16 at 23:34
  • Could also be Earth-orbiting satellites. – a CVn Mar 28 '16 at 11:01
  • Offtopic IMO. Not related to photography at all. – Euri Pinhollow Mar 28 '16 at 12:04
  • I'm voting to close this question because it's better suited to astronomy.SE, where it's already been posted. – Philip Kendall Mar 31 '16 at 9:17
2

There exists software that automatically detects stars and planets in your astrophotography pictures. The technique is called plate solving, and they use a scale and rotation invariant hashing algorithm.

Examples are:

  • uniMap: a free/opensource astronomy software, [...] mainly developed to do the plate-solving (automated detection and sky catalog matching) for astrophotography [...] also a wide range of features like plotting the asteroids path, artificial Earth satellites passing through, integrated telescope and digital/video camera control, online database/interface to work as a collaboration tool for plate solutions
  • Sequence Generator Pro: whose goal is to provide a best-in-class image capture suite for astrophotography

There are also online solvers where you can upload a picture and get an annotated picture back.

Examples are:

  • astrometry.net: If you have astronomical imaging of the sky with celestial coordinates you do not know—or do not trust—then Astrometry.net is for you. Input an image and we'll give you back astrometric calibration meta-data, plus lists of known objects falling inside the field of view. (Upload seems to be broken though)
  • AstroBin: is an image hosting website specifically targeted to astrophotographers: it's the first and the last place where you need to upload your astrophotography images. Made by an astrophotographer, for the astrophotographers.

Here is an example of a picture of the night sky I took in Kakadu National park, Australia, and below is the annotated picture I got back from AstroBin.

enter image description here

| improve this answer | |
8

Are those other planets or other stars? Or is that a lens effect?

Looks to me like a planet and some moons. I don't know where you are, but Jupiter has been very bright in the night sky lately in my neighborhood, and with a long enough lens it's not hard to see some of its moons.

Seen through a sufficiently powerful telescope, a planet looks very different form a star. Stars are brilliant, like diamonds. Planets are round and less brilliant, what you'd expect from giant spherical rocks that aren't on fire. But most camera lenses don't offer enough magnification to let you tell the difference, and because planets are relatively close they're often the brightest things in the sky other than our own moon, so they're usually overexposed in your photos.

Perhaps the easiest way to figure out what you're looking at is to get an astronomy app for your smartphone or computer. I use Sky Guide on my iPhone, which uses the phone's compass, accelerometer, and GPS to show you the part of the sky that the phone is pointed at, which makes it very easy to find the objects that you're interested in. And you can change the time and date that it shows, so you can see what the sky would have looked like 3 days or 100 years ago or in the future. If you can remember the direction in which you pointed the camera and read the date from a photo's EXIF data, you should be able to figure out what the objects in your photo are. Well worth the $3 price.

In the past, I've used Starry Night on my laptop computer, and it offers similar capabilities as Sky Guide. There are probably some other good software options as well -- the main point here is that there's software out there that makes it easy to figure this stuff out.

| improve this answer | |
  • Thanks! The bright object in question was ~60 degrees above the horizon, and ESE of me (East-south-east). I took the picture on 3-25-16 from Madison, Wisconsin. None of these apps on my Android phone worked, they kept pointing the wrong direction. – Bobdabiulder Mar 27 '16 at 14:43
  • I got it, and you were right!! – Bobdabiulder Mar 27 '16 at 14:51
  • 2
    Stellarium, free, can also be helpful. – D. Jurcau Mar 27 '16 at 17:59
  • Or you could use a simple online planisphere tool, like this one. – Ilmari Karonen Mar 28 '16 at 0:02
  • 1
    @Bobdabiulder you may need to calibrate the compass first to make it work – phuclv Mar 28 '16 at 2:40
5

I'm almost certain that this is Jupiter and two moons. I base this on:

  • We see three objects, one very bright and two much less so. The lesser two are of comparable brightness. This is consistent with a planet and two moons.
  • The center of the three objects lie in a straight line, consistent with a planetary system.
  • The angle of the straight line is consistent with the ecliptic when viewed close to the East (or West) horizon. Jupiter's moons do orbit in the ecliptic plane.
  • The objects appear as dots and have not refraction spikes. Generally, planets appear in photographs as dots without refraction spikes as they can be resolved to a size larger than a point source. Stars have refractions spikes as they are a point source of light as viewed from Earth.
  • I look at Jupiter, Saturn, Mars, and Venus through 90mm binoculars often enough to recognize them!
  • Jupiter is currently at close to its closest approach to Earth and appears very bright. It is a compelling target for photographers, binoculars, and naked-eye observing as well.
| improve this answer | |
3

The rule-of-thumb is: When you think "That's a bright star!" it's a planet.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    Wow, Sirius is a bright planet! – Michael Mar 27 '16 at 21:21
  • For a long time I fell into the trap of thinking Sirius must be the brightest object in the sky, not just the brightest star. Actually, the brightest object now is often the ISS. – Laurence Payne Mar 27 '16 at 22:43
  • 2
    @LaurencePayne I think the sun is brighter than the ISS. So is the moon. So are Iridium flares. – Michael C Mar 27 '16 at 23:36
  • @MichaelClark What even is a Iridium flare? – Bobdabiulder Mar 28 '16 at 0:47
  • 2
    Bright sun reflection off the solar panels of a communication satellite of the Iridium family. They fade in and out over just a handful of seconds. An app like Sky Guide can be set up to give you notifications a few minutes before one is going to be visible at your location. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_flare – Russell Borogove Mar 28 '16 at 2:23
0

According to Sky Map on google play, I am very confident that this is Jupiter.

| improve this answer | |
  • And I'm very confident that the two minor white globes are actually internal lens reflections of the bright body of Jupiter. Surely Jupiter's moons can't be that comparatively large? – HamishKL Mar 27 '16 at 20:29
  • 2
    @HamishKL They can be when they are out of focus. Any sufficiently bright point of light can be enlarged simply by defocusing it. See photo.stackexchange.com/q/47592/15871 – Michael C Mar 27 '16 at 23:37
  • The brightness of all of it affects that. Logically, it makes sense what the standing hypothesis is: As the Wolfram Alpha link shows, the moons are aligned roughly 45 degrees up and to the right of Jupiter. This matches the photo, and also an internal lens reflection would be down instead of up (not always though). I think the overall brightness effected it. – Bobdabiulder Mar 28 '16 at 0:43
  • Good points; I'd assumed the image was an off-centre crop, hence the 'reflections' going the wrong direction. Who would have thought you'd be able to see planetary satellites with a point & shoot camera!? – HamishKL Mar 28 '16 at 1:44
  • @HamishKL IKR lol – Bobdabiulder Mar 31 '16 at 21:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.