I'm doing a final project at school and I've chosen to do abstract architectural shots, like the works of Andreas Gursky and Carlo Cafferini. I've got a Canon EOS 1100D and would like to buy a lens that would lend itself best to abstract architectural shots.

My budget is limited to £200... For some reason I hate the whole concept of a telephoto lens—probably irrational though. If it's what is needed, I will get it.

All the arcane photography language has made me beg questions I didn't know existed; do I want a prime lens or a zoom? I read that a wide angle can add barrel distortion that could be utilised creatively... Or, look really bad no doubt!

Anyway, I'm a relative beginner but I've done two years with only the EF-S 18-55 kit lens. I'd like to get a flattened perspective. I'd also like to isolate details and in turn, decontextualise the subject.

  • I don't require a product recommendation, just someone to suggest focal length, aperture would be great. Yes, I mean the EF-S 18-55 kit lens. google.co.uk/… google.co.uk/…
    – Victoria
    Jan 11 '16 at 2:38
  • The Gursky image, if cropped, would be more abstract. I like the flattened perspective. google.co.uk/… google.co.uk/…
    – Victoria
    Jan 11 '16 at 2:42
  • I wish to use an alternative to the kit lens in order to achieve different results. To isolate details and in turn, decontextualise the subject.
    – Victoria
    Jan 11 '16 at 2:44
  • I edited your question to include the information from the comments. Sorry I forgot to mention you can do that. Feel free to remove the comments if you want.
    – inkista
    Jan 11 '16 at 23:05
  • With a £200 budget, consider renting a lens instead of buying. There are lots of great lenses you can rent for a month on £200, but few that you can buy for that price.
    – Caleb
    Feb 9 '16 at 6:11

Ok, looked at the work of Carlo Cafferini and Andreas Gursky you linked to, and did a bit of googling. Gurksy's work is mainly done with large format Linhof cameras, so whatever lens choice you go with, it's not going to look the same with an ASP-C format sensor that has no access to movements--at least not with a single shot. And Cafferini may be using something similar, although in his case, I'm more tempted to say he's either pano stitching with a normal or tele lens, or doing perspective correction digitally.

Whether you want a zoom or a prime lens kind of depends on how you plan to use it, and the individual lenses you're considering. Zoom lenses vary their focal length (like your 18-55), while prime lenses have a fixed focal length. They tend to be simpler, mechanically, and often sport wider max. apertures. But whether one is the right fit for you or not does depend on how/what you plan to shoot, working distance limitations, and your budget. In your case, I don't think there's a hard and fast type (zoom or prime) that's better for what you want to do.

Frankly, I'm not sure a lens is necessarily what you need to be looking at here, as much as post production technique, possibly involving perspective manipulation, lens correction, and panorama stitching. The complete lack of distortion is kind of the clue to me that something's been monkeyed with digitally in post, because most lenses with that wide an angle of view don't much tend to look that geometrically perfect or neutral. Panoramas do.

OTOH, you may also be able to do something similar with a tilt-shift lens (the mainstay of architectural photography), but a £200 budget won't get you one of those--they're £1000-£2000 lenses--you might be able to rent one, but they're also not the easiest lenses to master.

You might also try an ultrawide lens, and then correct for lens distortion and perspective in post, but a single shot is unlikely to get you super-high resolution, particularly after you're stretching pixels around in post, so a panorama with a longer lens may be another choice.

Sorry I can't be more decisive on this. I have no idea of what the actual technique and gear is being used. I've just stitched a ton of panoramas and I know that look vs. an ultrawide, and to me the abstract images you linked to look more like perspective-corrected shots.

A number of Cafferini's street shots, though, "feel" to me like 35mm-equivalency type shots, so one possible lens to look at that might actually fall within your budget is the EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM. But I could be horribly wrong.


It depends on what exactly it is that you want to do. A long-focus lens (telephoto, large focal length) will compress distances between objects along the line you're shooting and make things look flat.

Wide-angle lenses (small focal length) exaggerate perspective and make things look deeper than they really are. They also give you a wide field of view which might be useful when shooting indoors as you can fit more of the scene into the frame without having to move too far back.

Large aperture (low f-number) means that the lens lets in more light, allowing you to use lower ISO values and/or shorter exposure times. Large apertures also give you a shallower depth of field. Prime lenses usually have larger apertures at the expense of being able to zoom.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.