I was recently watching the following comparison video between the Nikon 85mm 1.4G and 1.8G (judge as you will):


When they showed off very similar comparison shots between the two lenses, it looked like the 1.4G produced much warmer and beautiful colors. Is it possible for a lens to be warmer than another? I'm wondering if the guy in this video just took his shots at different enough times that maybe the sun was more set, giving the light a more pleasing orange glow.

  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Possible duplicate of How does a lens affect the saturation of a picture? \$\endgroup\$
    – Philip Kendall
    Oct 18, 2015 at 6:19
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ While the questions are similar, saturation and warmth are quite different. \$\endgroup\$
    – mattdm
    Oct 18, 2015 at 12:14
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Particularly, this question isn't answered by the primary answer there (veiling glare reduces contrast). \$\endgroup\$
    – mattdm
    Oct 18, 2015 at 12:16

1 Answer 1


The photographic image is degraded by flare. Flare is stray light that reverberates around inside the lens and inside the camera. The camera lens consists of multiple polished glass or plastic surfaces and maybe a mirror and if a digital, a cover glass over the image sensor. All these polished surfaces both transmit and reflect light. About 5% of the image forming rays are lost at each encounter with a polished surface due to reflection. Some of that light comingles with the image forming rays and bathes the film or image sensor. The result is flare and ghosting.

Modern lenses are coated with a thin film of fluoride or other minerals. In fact most lenses may have multiple coats on every polished surface. You can often see that the front element of camera lenses and binoculars has a yellow or perhaps rose tint. These are coated lenses.

A tip of the hat to Harold Dennis Taylor (English 1862-1942 Optician). Taylor obsreved in 1894 that old lenses of the same design passes more light than new ones. He deduced that the older lenses has accumulated a tarnish due to atmospheric pollution from coal burning and the like. Investigation showed that older lenses with this "bloom", passed 2% or more light than ones that were freshly polished. Taylor experimented with suphuretted hydrogen and other chemical to artificially age lenses and was granted patent 29,561/1904.

A modern optical system consist of multiple lens elements, some are dense flint some light crown and other mixes of glass. Such multiple elements mitigate aberrations that degrade the optical image. Also modern lenses are multi-coated. It is the thickness of the coat that does the trick to reduce reflections. Some lens have as many as 12 coats, one specific to one frequency of light.

Now the coat must be ¼ of the wavelength of the color it is to control. This is a super thin and coat and variations are the norm. It is coat thickness variations plus the makeup of the glass that slightly alters the final hue realized by a lens. No two coming off the line are exactly the same. That’s why the color cast of one lens will differ from another.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Hmmm so two lenses of the exact same model could have different amounts of warmth? I'd imagine certain lenses are also designed to have more "accurate" coatings to make colors look more real and warm as well? \$\endgroup\$
    – Ampp3
    Oct 19, 2015 at 13:13
  • \$\begingroup\$ Coating is difficult, the ideal coating for a lens index of refraction 1.5 is one with an index of 1.7 and a thickness of 1.4 x 10-4mm. That's hard to control - a compromise between quality control and keeping the cost of the final product reasonable. \$\endgroup\$ Oct 20, 2015 at 13:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.