I have read in many blogs and forums that when we have a larger dynamic range, we may lose details. Of course, I have experienced completely white areas in taking photos with bright sky. As far as I know, dynamic range is the difference between the darkest part and the whitest part of the photo.

Question 1:

If I am taking photo of a red basket against heavy sunlight, I am losing some details of the basket. If I add a black umbrella on one corner of the photo, will I lose more detail of the basket? [Now that I introduced a black umbrella, is my dynamic range going to be larger and going to lose more detail of the basket?]

Question 2:

Assume I have sky on top right corner and the black umbrella on bottom left corner of the frame. Technically, why the film is losing the ability to preserve detail of the basket (in the middle of the frame) if I have more dynamic range?


1 Answer 1


The key thing to realize here is that we use the term dynamic range in two related but different ways. First, we use it to describe the scene — the difference between the deepest shadows and the brightest highlights in the actual world before us. Second, we use it to refer to a property of a camera sensor (or film, or print). That is the difference between dark and light that that specific camera (or film, or print) can show. Because technology isn't perfect, this is always limited, and often much more limited than the real world.

So, it isn't that the film or sensor (or printed paper) is magically losing detail when the dynamic range is high. It's that the medium can only capture detail in a certain range, but by adjusting exposure parameters (aperture, shutter speed), you can "slide" that range up and down.

If the scene is low dynamic range, its entirety can be captured, no problem.

But, in a high dynamic range scene, to capture shadow detail, you might slide it down so far that the highlights just can't fit — or, to capture highlights, you might slide the "exposure window" up, and then it can't cover the shadow detail.

The issue is that the exposure adjustments are global — you can't easily decide that you'll have a shorter shutter speed for the sunlight, and a longer one for the umbrella, to get both right. (Although, of course, there are techniques to work around that, as explained in a lot of other questions here — for example How to adjust exposure for both the sky and the landscape?.)

In your first example, you are losing detail on the red basket because, presumably, you've adjusted the exposure to cover the brightly-light rest of the scene. If you add a black umbrella and keep the exposure the same, nothing will change in the rest of the image. However, since that umbrella is likely to be even darker than the basket, it will show even less detail. If you adjust your exposure to compensate for that, showing more shadow detail in both the umbrella and the basket, you will necessarily also increase the exposure of the sky, and if that's outside of the dynamic range of your film or sensor, you'll lose detail there. Note that if you're using automatic exposure, this may happen automatically, as the camera attempts to balance the scene (even cameras which aren't "smart" can do this — a basic exposure program tries to render the whole scene as neutral gray on average, and adding a big area of black will make it choose a brighter exposure.)

In your second example: it's not. You just can't cover them both. Image you're sharing a king-sized bed and have only a narrow blanket. If both you and your friend are at the extreme edges of the bed (by analogy, one very dark and one very light), the blanket can keep one of you warm, but you have to pick which one.

  • \$\begingroup\$ It is more clera now - it's all about where I "refer" (black or white) to decide my expousre. But I have related question. People say, new cameras has better dynamic range these days and it can help in preserving the details. How is new cameras resolving this problem? \$\endgroup\$
    – LCJ
    Commented Sep 29, 2015 at 23:17
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ They're intrinsically able to capture more detail in the shadow without getting lost to noise, which means more overall dynamic range. Or, in the bed analogy, they provide a wider blanket. \$\endgroup\$
    – mattdm
    Commented Sep 29, 2015 at 23:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.