# How do you exercise depth of field in practice?

I'm really frustrated because many of my nicely framed photos are of poor technical quality, mainly because of the wrong depth of field or subject being out of focus. I always thought I know theory but I'm having hard time to put that into practice. How do you learn to set the right focus and depth of field in practice?

Here are some details of how I find hard putting theory in practice.

Playing with aperture. In theory I know that depth of field depends on the matrix size, the focal length, aperture and a distance to a photographed subject, lots of calculators online can compute depth of field for me. However, when I'm outside photographing friends and expect to have them sharp and the wall just behind them blurred I cannot really stop for too long, measure a distance to them, and do calculations. There's no time for that. I tried with 50mm lens doing on f/1.4 to take a photo of a couple standing 2m from me. Only first person, a woman, closer to me is in focus, while the other is blurred, just because, as I calculated later, depth of field was around 9cm. How, the hell, should I know that in real time?

Playing with preview function. Yes, there's a magic button in Canons to preview a frame with actually selected aperture but what I see really small and dark for larger apertures. That doesn't seem very practical to me.

Playing with focus points. Canon body let you choose focus points manually: central or side points. Another option is to chose central point. But when a situation happens I often have little time to update the focus point. The best solution I think is to keep a central focus point and freeze focus and then move lens.

• Can you state which camera? Is it a dSLR or what? Commented Sep 18, 2015 at 20:53
• Canon 1000D, a DSLR. Commented Sep 18, 2015 at 20:57
• I know start to think this might be a duplicate of photo.stackexchange.com/questions/10699/…. Basically, using f/1.4 for moving persons outside of studio is risky and maybe more safer choice would be to use f/4-f/5.6 Commented Sep 18, 2015 at 21:07
• possible duplicate of Is there a 'rule of thumb' that I can use to estimate depth of field while shooting? Commented Sep 19, 2015 at 0:03
• @null, the question was how to get this experience. Practice can result in experience only if practicing is done right. This is what I have asked for. Commented Sep 20, 2015 at 8:42

## knowing this

Lenses used to be marked with DOD around the scale on the focus ring.

You should learn how shallow it is for large - aperture shooting. Don't memorize inches, but think (nose-to-ear only just fits), (multiple-subjects lax fit), etc.

There are DOF calculator apps you can play with to form your own notes.

## live preview

Does that body have a touch screen? My 70D lets me touch where I wish the focus to be. I never got the hang of moving the focal point around using the knobs and do what you say like in the old days when there wa only one: I did learn the "lock" button, in the first EOS bodies. The live preview on anything other than the 70D and 7Dii won't autofocus as fast as the hardware viewfinder. But doesn't the viewfinder have indicators that show what it focused on? You can tell from that if one or both faces are in focus, if you learn to watch it.

## what aperture

You might choose something other than the widest possible for the situation, not just because of DOF but the lens' s own performance. If that's a prime lens ("nifty fifty"?) it should be ok wide ooen though.

But figure out what is a good (acceptable) dof for the situation. I noticed a picture taken of my neice at Dallas Comic Con for a local newpaper a few months ago in available light was full-frame f/1.2, and her eye was sharp but the field was so shallow that her ear was blurred.

That pro was maximising light, and knew that he must focus on the eyeball or the photo is junk, and the subject could not be turned or need interesting detail elsewhere on the head.

If you are shooting a coctail party with people gathered at tables, figure you need a dof of a foot or so for people sticking their heads together, etc. and don't go with f/1.4.

## bracket and burst

Always shoot bursts. You are doing that anyway. Does the camera have a shift-AE burst? Try Magic lantern firmware and see if it does. Otherwise, rely on the flexibility of a good exposure and use a darker-that-optimum version if the brighter one is too shallow.

Use the knob for shift-AE. After learning the safe aperature values, shift the aperature/speed towards the smaller aperature you want, without leaving P mode.

• I found there's also A-DEP (auto depth-of-field) mode, which sets aperture in such a way all focus points will be included in a sharp area, i.e., will be within DoF. However, I do not really have control what which points camera will consider as focus points. For instance, I wanted to have only two glasses sharp, but the camera decided also my curtains in the background to be in focus. Commented Sep 19, 2015 at 21:14
• Magic Lantern doesn't support Canon 1000D: magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=9900.msg95304#msg95304 "Unfortunately it seems very unlikely that ML ever will come to the 1000D (I have one as well - collecting dust). The camera is simply too old, underpowered and very rarely used these days by people who want the benefits of ML.". Commented Sep 19, 2015 at 21:29
• Fortunately, there's AEB (Auto Exposure Bracketing) feature in Canon. But why do you suggest to use it with P mode? In P mode both aperture and shutter speed are selected automatically. Tv seemed to give me more control, because I set the shutter speed and aperture is selected automatically. Commented Sep 19, 2015 at 21:31
• In p mode, you can slide between equvilent exposures -- shift AE. After it meters, you can decide to "needs a different aperture" or "needs a different shutter" considering the combination. Or if you don't, you get full automatic. Commented Sep 19, 2015 at 22:38
• The earliest EOS in 1987 had a auto-dep mode. You would autofocus on one point and lock it, then autofocus on a different point (by moving the camera so the singke af hotspot was over the desired point) and lock that, then compose the shot with the locked settings. Commented Sep 19, 2015 at 22:40

JDługosz's answer was great. But honestly, the best method is simply to practice. It sounds dismissive, but after lots of practice, you start getting a feel for the right settings in a particular situation.

Use a model (friend, family member, mannequin, etc), and take test shots at every aperture value your lens will let you use. Take the best shots you can for these tests. Then, when you can do A/B comparisons with the shots in your computer, pay attention to what is focused and what is blurred in the shots.

You can spend the time "mathing" your photo knowledge (and believe me, I love the maths and physics of photography), but it's the practice that will most help you develop your intuition and knowledge of the right settings when you approach a particular scene.

• Math is fun but I'd rather shoot. Commented Sep 19, 2015 at 2:18
• Stuffed animal is better than friend. Get identical shots as you fiddle with the settings, and come back for more later. Commented Sep 19, 2015 at 22:42
• Only if that's a human-size stuffed animal :-) Shooting small objects like a cup was not the same for me as taking pictures of people. Commented Sep 20, 2015 at 0:30

There are many variables for calculating the depth of field, but in practice you only have to remember two or three combinations that work for you. To find them out, use DoF tables in a reverse way.

Some scenarios:

• For a headshot with a 50mm lens you decide that a safe DoF would be +/- 8cm. A DoF table tells you not to open more than f/2.8.

• A sports event: you know that the subjects are running around a lot, and you would be comfortable to have +/- 1m DoF. You estimate the distance to be 7m. The lens you bring with you is 85mm. The table would tell you not to open more than f/8.

For other photographers or scenarios this may be different. The point is that you define these scenarios for yourself, examine the DoF tables for your lenses and go to the event with just one number in mind: Not to open more than f/x.

By the way: Professional photographers do this for the shutter speed as well. When they go out to an event for example with a telephoto lens, they know their personal limits for a shake-free photo and don't go beyond.

Edit: If you want to have a blurred background, but cannot use a low f-stop, then increase the distance between subject and background.

• DOF Calculator app for Android has a reverse mode feature that calculates recommends aperture and lens based on a depth of field we want to get. Commented Sep 19, 2015 at 11:44

I tried with 50mm lens doing on f/1.4 to take a photo of a couple standing 2m from me. Only first person, a woman, closer to me is in focus, while the other is blurred, just because, as I calculated later, depth of field was around 9cm. How, the hell, should I know that in real time?

This comes with experience. In the meanwhile, shoot a series with different f-stops and pick the right one. Seeing the results side by side will also help you estimate the right settings next time you shoot.

Canon body let you choose focus points manually: central or side points. Another option is to chose central point. But when a situation happens I often have little time to update the focus point. The best solution I think is to keep a central focus point and freeze focus and then move lens.

This needs to be used very carefully. Google "focus and recompose" to see diagrams showing why this technique can cause miss-focus.

Speaking of best technique, I think the best is if the photographer pays attention to what is going on and tries to predict what will happen in the next moment. I know this is not always easy, but it gives time to the photographer to think about the focus, exposure and composition a little bit. I think this is how most of the great photographs capturing decisive moments were made.