I want to buy a ISO 400 film for photography, and I know Portra400 is good but I would prefer any cheaper alternative, as I am going to burn a lot.

  • 2
    In particular, what do you want to learn about photography that you can't learn using digital?
    – Philip Kendall
    Sep 9 '15 at 7:49
  • I don't think this is a good question for the site, but we have too few film related questions. I would recommend a rewrite. By the way: Ilford hp5+ for the win. I disagree with the "cheapest film" suggestion. Buy excellet, fresh, film and enjoy excellent result. Better yet if you do it at formats larger than 35, with Medium format cameras you will get larger negatives which are a great thing.
    – Francesco
    Sep 9 '15 at 9:35
  • 1
    The first thing to learn with film is not to burn
    – null
    Sep 9 '15 at 12:37
  • Do you have space to set up a small darkroom? (Even a light-sealed bathroom can do.)
    – mattdm
    Sep 9 '15 at 12:38
  • 1
    I would suggest not using film at all. Learning is based on practice, which means taking as many pictures as possible; if you're stopping to load new film all the time, or worrying about how much it's going to cost, you'll be limiting yourself. My own photographic skills went way up when I switched to digital. Sep 25 '15 at 17:02

Film photography is more expensive and more hassle than digital photography. Therefore, don't do initial learning with film. Learn the basics with digital. Once you get the equipment, the incremental cost of a picture is basically 0, unlike with film. You can learn about general exposure, framing, shutter speed effects, depth of field effects, and the like just with digital. These issues are the same whether the sensor is a piece of film or a piece of silicon.

After you've learned the basics, if you still really want to, then you can experiment with film. At that point you should already have a good feel for whether a shot you are considering taking has a chance of coming out or it's not worth bothering with. You want to try film after the "burn a lot" initial learning phase.

Even more with than digital, good film photography has a lot to do with knowing when to walk away.

  • 1
    @Null: I rolled back your edit because it changed the message in substantial and incorrect way. I stand by my statement that digital is less hassle and cheaper than film. And yes, I've done significant levels of both (used a Nikon F3-T for 28 years). Entry level equipment can be had cheaply either way, but film has a unavoidable incremental cost and more associated work per picture. Sep 12 '15 at 18:46
  • Maybe for 35mm and below, but beyond that, I'm not so sure.
    – null
    Sep 12 '15 at 19:04
  • @null: In this context, we're clearly talking about 35mm photography, and possibly smaller electronic sensors. At larger sizes, electronic sensors get prohibitively expensive, then unavailable altogether. Sep 13 '15 at 12:22
  1. For trying out film photography, buy the cheapest, non-expired ISO 400 colour negative film you can find - in an attempt to keep costs down. Sure, you can buy Portra if you want, but no film will make up for a poorly-exposed shot (for example). Good results can easily be achieved with Kodak and Fujifilm's cheaper films.

  2. Learn to be frugal with your photos. Don't "burn a lot".

  3. Note your settings, so that when you see the results, you can see what worked and what didn't.


Osullic's answer is good, but a couple more points:

  1. Try lots of different films. If you want to get into film photography the bets thing about it is the different feel each film has. You might end up loving Portra (I do) but you won't know until you try!

  2. I would say that learning to be frugal is a good idea, but while learning it is indeed difficult. For me, in the UK, the development and scanning is the cost, not the film, so "burning a lot" will cost a lot - so it's worth trying to avoid that.

  3. However, having said that - if you see a shot that you think will be great, then burn a few ON THAT SHOT - you won't get any feedback on if your metering (manual or otherwise) was right, so if it's a scene you really want, then bracket - take a series of shots of varied exposure either side of what you think is right. This has saved a shot for me more times than I can count - especially important if you are into all-manual vintage cameras.

  4. I have never noted settings to be honest as it's a right pain, but one suggestion would be to take a quick second shot of the scene with a digital, tweaked to be close enough to what you want that the EXIF will give you an idea of what to aim for if you really screw up. Even a smartphone will be good enough for this in most cases.

  • When I first began, I noted settings (let's say for a couple of roll). I quickly stopped doing it, and with a little practice I have learned to judge exposure even before metering. Then you develop, and then you print or scan and you appreciate the wonderful latitude of film :-)
    – Francesco
    Sep 11 '15 at 11:56

For an inexpensive B/W film, Kentmere 400 is excellent. I worked as the darkroom technician at a school. This is the film we gave students, and it worked out very well. Good quality, inexpensive and room for error.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.