2
\$\begingroup\$

I developed some Ilford FP4+ and on the edges it reads "Ilford FP4+ Safety Film". What does the safety film bit mean?

\$\endgroup\$

2 Answers 2

4
\$\begingroup\$

The predecessor to safety film; nitrocellulose film (nitrate film), based upon guncotton was by and large the most common base before Kodak began working with acetate film in 1948, bringing it to market in the early 1950's.

This acetate film was marketed as safety film, for it did not decompose as nitrate film did. Nitrate film was inherently flawed in that, over time, it would decay into nitric acid, which catalyzed its decomposition to an even greater extent. Furthermore, the all too common theatre tragedies of the early 20th century were in large part due to nitrate film catching on fire. If the film happened to get stuck in a carbon arc projector (common at the time), chances are it would begin to burn. For all intents and purpose, there is no putting out a nitrate film fire; it burns so furiously.

Acetate film was intended to rectify these often fatal flaws. While nitrate film was being phased out, acetate was marketed as "safety film" in order to distinguish it from the former. As I'm sure you can tell from my example though, this issue with film had largely to do with cinema, and from quite some time ago. It begs the question: Just how old is this FP4+ anyways?

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ I don't think it is very old. Maybe 2000s? \$\endgroup\$
    – Alex
    Jun 30, 2015 at 3:34
  • \$\begingroup\$ The label "safety film" stuck around even after it was no longer relevant. Guess it became just another meaningless marketing term. In other news, I must shut down this IBM compatible and travel home in my horseless carriage. \$\endgroup\$ Jun 30, 2015 at 4:02
6
\$\begingroup\$

It means the underlying film stock is NOT nitrocellulose (aka cellulose nitrate aka "nitrate"), which is dangerously flammable. But it seems silly now, the last nitrate film was produced in 1950.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Might not at all be silly to archivists that have to deal with both, and will have to take special precautions if in any doubt. \$\endgroup\$ Sep 27, 2019 at 16:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.