1
\$\begingroup\$

I have 2 camera bodies:

  • Nikon D610

  • Sony NEX-5R

I have these lenses (which I can fit on both cameras with a NEX adapter):

  • Opteka (Rokinon/Samyang) 6.5mm f3.5 Fisheye

  • Sigma 12-24 (Mark I)

I would like to make Interior 360 Virtual Tours. I have not bought a panoramic head yet.

Question:

  • Should I get a compact pano head (i.e. Nodal Ninja 3) and use the NEX 5R; Travel light, smaller footprint, easier to "maneuver." Or,

  • Should I get a full-sized pano head (i.e. Nodal Ninja 4) and be able to use my full-frame camera with superior image quality OR my smaller camera too; Bulkier, more expensive.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Take a look on automated panoheads. The price is not that high, but the added value is. gigapan.com/cms/shop/store \$\endgroup\$
    – Rafael
    Jun 25, 2015 at 17:58

1 Answer 1

1
\$\begingroup\$

I think you pretty much answered your own question--which is more important to you--image quality or traveling light? The difference probably isn't as big as you're thinking, since the NNs break down into pretty small packages, all told. I tend to keep my NN3 disassembled with the horizontal and vertical arm assemblies separate, so you're packing two bars, vs. an L-plate.

I would also state that I use a Nodal Ninja 3 with either my 5DMkII+Sigma 8/3.5 circular fisheye or my micro four-thirds GX-7 + Rokinon 7.5mm f/3.5 fisheye, and have no trouble with either, so getting a full-frame diagonal fisheye (say, a 15/2.8) might be an alternative to using the 12-24 and still sticking with the smaller head, but still having higher quality than the 7.5 will get you on APS-C (although, gotta say. It's no optical slouch--better performer, overall, for me than my Sigma 8/3.5 when used on APS-c).

But. With your NEX+mft Samyang/Rokinon 7.5/3.5 fisheye + adapter (if the fisheye lens's hood is shaved) is actually a popular combination among equirectangular shooters, because, like my 5DII+Sigma 8mm, you get 180° HFoV, and it can be handheld and only requires 4 shots around at 90-degree intervals to cover the entire sphere. A simple plumbline might be all that you need with that combo.

Obviously, however, if you swap to an ultrawide rectilinear lens, you're going to need more precise rotation and a lot more shots to cover the scene, and a panohead and tripod are more likely. And you're liable to be able to use the NN4 with both setups.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.