2
\$\begingroup\$

How to motion-blur the background while keeping the subject well exposed and in focus?

Mikael Jansson / Vogue Paris, May 2011

Mikael Jansson / Vogue Paris, May 2011

\$\endgroup\$

1 Answer 1

6
\$\begingroup\$

Use a flash with rear curtain sync and a long shutter speed.

The long shutter blurs the background and the subject.

However, at the end of the exposure, the rear curtain synced flash fires, which essentially adds a second exposure on top. The flash is significantly brighter compared to the ambient light, but due to its limited reach, it only hits the subject, not the background. (mostly) The so far accumulated blurry exposure of the subject is overpowered by the flash exposure, which is clear, because it is so short.

The flash is high above to the left of the camera, which you can tell from two things:

  1. The shadow under her chin
  2. Her head is very clear. Her leg appears to be transparent. This means the light is stronger above, near her head, overpowering the blur of the long exposure entirely. Due to the inverse square law the light falls off rapidly and is not powerful enough to do the same with the legs - the background shines through. The light must be near/above her head.

This is a nice creative technique. I have mixed feelings about using it for a vogue shot. Sure, it all looks artsy and creative, but being a product shot (I'm talking about the dress!) it doesn't work so well for me. The dress mixes with the background, it is blurry, it is not entirely visible... Imagine a BMW ad that only shows the rear lights of their new car disappearing in a dust cloud that the car leaves behind. Sure, that all could be (and very likely is) all intentional, but I'd rather see the dress more clearly, more from the front. What I'm trying to say is that you should not overdo this.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ I suspect that shot also has had some Photoshop work done to get the face so sharp. For example, the light trail to the left of her eyes looks like it was edited - it's shorter than all the others. \$\endgroup\$
    – Adam
    May 10, 2015 at 22:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.