I am on the hunt for a great camera bag. Since it will be home to my pride and joy equipment that I hope to one day (soon I hope) accumulate I need it to be well made, and protective of the gear first and foremost.

Next I need it to be usable and handy. To this end I was wondering if my intentions for aback-pack style bad is ok. I am skeptical because whenever I see photographers with camera bags they are always the hand held boxy type.

This may be coincidence and my perception only, or it may be a sign no one uses back pack style camera bags

Also since I have no idea what separates a great bag from the rest of the pack, some help pointing out thing I should look for would be great.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Just bought one of these: amazon.com/gp/product/B001L5U16Q So far, I love it. It allows easy access to the DSLR through the side, without taking it completely off (mitigating, somewhat, the main con in a backpack). Holds my D80 with 2 lenses, a TM700 camcorder, extra batteries etc, all in the lower compartment. Only con: it doesn't actually fit my work laptop - technically it's 17 inch, but it's huge. Fits my home laptop just fine. \$\endgroup\$
    – HiredMind
    Commented Jan 6, 2011 at 20:56
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I am in love with kata bags I found on the web. They also offer the same ability to remove the camera without removing the backpack: amazon.com/Kata-KT-D-3N1-22-Backpack-Laptop/dp/B002UHKR68 (Also, their bumblebee in white looks outstanding) \$\endgroup\$
    – kacalapy
    Commented Jan 6, 2011 at 21:33

7 Answers 7


As I spend considerable time, up to 10 hours in a day, hiking around the rain forests of British Columbia as well as the streets and parks of Vancouver I use a backpack and definitely would not be without it. I find it very comfortable to wear and holds my D300 with 7 lenses, 2 flashes and a few ancillary pieces. The comfort of having a well made backpack with comfortable straps more than makes up for the slight inconvenience of removing it to change lens or access equipment.

When I chose my backpack I looked for the following items ...

  • Padded compartment for DSLR with lens attached & at least 2 additional lenses.

  • Separate compartment for personal items, which I sometimes use to hold additional lenses beyond the 2 or 3 in the main camera compartment.

  • Ability to strap on a tripod, and this MUST be centrally mounted otherwise the pack weight is shifted off center and becomes uncomfortable.

  • Side entry to extract DSLR meaning I can swing the bag round on one shoulder strap instead of taking it totally off.

  • Built in rain cover - obviously to keep stuff dry in the 3+ meters of rain we get annually around the rain forests here, but also keeps stuff secure when hiking round town and protects the pack from wet ground when laying it down.

  • Internal pockets for memory cards, documents, cloths, etc.

  • Additional external pockets and straps for attaching additional items like water bottles and rain jackets.

  • Proper adjustable and padded waist belt and shoulder straps with chest strap across the shoulder straps, critical to comfort when hiking a full day.

ALL of these items were met with the Lowepro Primus AW and as a bonus it is made from recycled material :)

Last points to make are to spend considerable time trying packs on, take your gear and see how it fits, and don't settle for the first one you find ... this one was my third pack before I got the right one for me.

Good hunting!

  • \$\begingroup\$ It seems that Lowepro Primus AW is not discontinued. I haven't found a similar model from Lowepro. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 6, 2012 at 10:35
  • \$\begingroup\$ Real shame that LowePro are only using recycled material in the smaller Terraclime range of bags now. For functionality I would suggest the Flipside 500 AW or the Dryzone Rover as both can haul large amounts of gear allowing for your equipment list to grow, can handle wet conditions and have central mount for tripod. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 8, 2012 at 21:16
  • \$\begingroup\$ I've ended up wanting a Kata 3N1-20 (kata-bags.us/…) - but the Primus AW looked good. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 8, 2012 at 22:01

You can read about all the pros and cons of all bag types at the link below. Basically you must compromise size, weight, comfort and accessibility. No bag fits all uses. The more typical bag for photography is called a messenger bag. Here are the cons of backpacks:


  • Must be removed to access gear.
  • Working with gear is uncomfortable, usually requires bag to be put down.
  • Gear is not in sight, higher risk of being robbed.
  • Rarely counts as a personal item for flights.

Source: http://www.neocamera.com/article.php?id=camera_bags

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Hmmm. While I agree that removing the backpack to get to gear is annoying, if your backpack is comfortable to wear, there shouldn't be a problem with wearing it while shooting. (I do it all the time!) And I've never had anyone question it as a personal item on an airplane, although of course they are getting more and more strict. \$\endgroup\$
    – mattdm
    Commented Dec 31, 2010 at 22:03
  • \$\begingroup\$ I dunno about robbery, either. If that's a big worry, note that some backpacks have access to camera gear through an opening that goes against your back rather than facing out. \$\endgroup\$
    – mattdm
    Commented Dec 31, 2010 at 22:05
  • \$\begingroup\$ @mattdm - Yes, I've seen such backpacks. They are usually padded enough too to deter slashers (people who cut open your bag while you are distracted) compared to non-photo backpacks. As for the personal item criteria, it says 'rarely'. Some are small enough but most are not to satisfy airline rules (note the difference between carry-on and personal item as well), whether they apply the rules is a matter of luck. Satisfying the rules nearly always works. \$\endgroup\$
    – Itai
    Commented Dec 31, 2010 at 22:24
  • \$\begingroup\$ Many small camera backpacks will fit in the personal-item rules. For American Airlines, to pick one at random, the rule includes a "book bag or tote" as long as H+W+D is <= 36"; for my Tamrac bag, that total is 32". \$\endgroup\$
    – mattdm
    Commented Dec 31, 2010 at 22:31
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I use Lowepro Fastpack, which has a side-accessible compartment so I don't have to remove it to get the camera. I think it's a useful compromise :-) \$\endgroup\$
    – che
    Commented Jan 1, 2011 at 12:03

Since I schlep around our city all day without a car, a backpack is my preferred way to carry camera gear. Sling bags and messenger bags, which go on one shoulder, can be tiring and make you feel lopsided after a while. I also prefer a design with separate compartment for non-camera items. This is particularly handy as a new dad -- you can put diapers and snacks and spare changes of clothes and whatever else in there.

The major downside is access to your camera equipment. I currently have a Crumpler "Sinking Barge", which has a gusseted lower compartment for camera stuff -- this opens for easy access but won't spill everything out. You can kind of swing it around on one arm to do this without taking the bag off, but it's a pain.

The other downside is that a bag which will also include room for a laptop is usually unfortunately large, and can be unwieldy on a train or bus. The Crumpler is super-well made and very comfortable to wear, but it's huge -- and the model I have is the smaller one in its line.

Smaller backpacks exist, though. Before I had a larger laptop, I used a Tamrac Express Pack 8, and a shoved my Sony Vaio U101 into the top. Much more compact, and I still take that out when I don't need my laptop. It's small, but I can fit my Pentax K-7 with an attached prime lens and two other small primes into the camera compartment, and a flash and even a collapsible reflector into the top. The access is definitely weird because of the flap pocket, but on the other hand that would provide some protection against theft if that's a big concern.


For me, the biggest con to owning a backpack is that I can't hold as much stuff as I can with a 'standard format' square camera bag or camera case. Of course the flip side pro is that it's generally more portable than a square bag or hardshell case. For me I eventually ended up with a backpack, a square softshell bag, AND a hardshell case... Depending on what I am going to do, each have their place.


After debating this question with myself for several weeks I finally settled on the Lowepro Flipside backpack. With this model the opening is against your back and is accessed by spinning the bag around to your front with the waist-belt buckled.

For the three months I've had it I've been very pleased and I absolutely love hiking with the weight on both shoulders. My big fear when looking at backpacks was that I would be forced to set the whole shebang down in the dirt when changing lenses. The Flipside solves that problem admirably.


I recently bought the Kata R-103 backpack. So far, I am very content with it. What is especially nice is that you can access your camera without taking the entire backpack off: Kata R-103

I think this gains out the biggest disadvantage of regular photo backpacks - hard accessibility.

But that's not the only good thing about this bag. Just have a look at the Amazon reviews. It is extremely stable and allows you to carry a laptop and tripod as well as the camera equipment.


I use a nice everyday backpack, and keep my camera wrapped in a tshirt as far up in the backpack as I can. This particular backpack (a Haglöfs, a swedish brand) opens from the side, which means I can open it and remove my gear without taking it off, which is nice. I suppose a real camera backpack would be even better, but I need to carry around everything else every day (no car, going to a university) so I haven't found any good camera bag yet.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.